SAP C_HCMP_2311 Exam - Topic 6 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_HCMP_2311 exam

Question #: 8
Topic #: 6

Which operations would you use in a personnel calculation rule (PCR) called by function PIT (Process the IT table) to reduce the amount of a wage type by 10% and also retain it for further processing?

AAMT 0.90 ADDWT*

BAMT* 0.90 ADDWTI

CAMT 0.10 ADDWT*

DAMT 0.10 ADDWTI*

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Hubert at Apr 12, 2024, 07:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_HCMP_2311 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lindsey

3 months ago

I'm not sure about A, feels like it might not work as expected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronna

3 months ago

Wait, why would you use ADDWTI? Isn't that just for different calculations?

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

3 months ago

C doesn't make sense, it adds 10% instead of reducing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trevor

4 months ago

I think B is the better choice, it retains the amount properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

4 months ago

Definitely going with A, seems right for reducing by 10%.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvia

4 months ago

I believe we should be using AMT 0.10 ADDWTI to keep the reduced amount for further processing, but I might be mixing it up with another rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Esteban

4 months ago

I'm a bit confused about whether to use ADDWT or ADDWTI. I feel like ADDWTI is for retaining the value, but I can't recall clearly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamal

4 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question where we had to adjust amounts, and I think option A looks familiar for reducing the amount.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

5 months ago

I think we need to reduce the wage type by multiplying it by 0.90, but I'm not sure if we should use ADDWT or ADDWTI for retaining it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

5 months ago

I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to review the operations and make sure I understand how to reduce the wage type by 10% and retain it for further processing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delsie

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident that the answer is A. The AMT operation reduces the wage type by 90% (which is the same as reducing it by 10%), and the ADDWT operation retains it for further processing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myong

5 months ago

Wait, I'm a bit confused. Do I need to use the ADDWTI operation instead of ADDWT to retain the wage type for further processing?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisha

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. I need to use the AMT operation to reduce the wage type by 10%, and then the ADDWT operation to retain it for further processing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mattie

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the operations carefully to make sure I reduce the wage type by 10% and retain it for further processing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronny

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know DKIM has something to do with DNS, but I can't remember the specific record type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elenora

5 months ago

I had a similar question where direct evidence was pivotal. I'm leaning towards that, but it feels a bit iffy here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Juliann

2 years ago

I'm going with Option A. It's the only one that seems to make sense to me. The others look like they're just trying to confuse us.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruby

2 years ago

Option D is the one! Multiplying the wage type by 0.10 and adding it to the wage type input? Genius!

upvoted 0 times

Brynn

2 years ago

That's a smart way to reduce the amount by 10% and keep it for further processing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlean

2 years ago

Option D is correct. Multiplying by 0.10 and adding to the input wage type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tora

2 years ago

I guess it depends on how the PCR is structured and what exactly we need to achieve in the scenario

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

2 years ago

Ah, trick question! Option C is the way to go. Reducing the wage type by 10% and adding the result to the original wage type is the way to retain it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jarvis

2 years ago

I'd go with Option B. Multiplying the wage type by 0.90 and adding it to the wage type input seems like the right way to reduce the amount by 10%.

upvoted 0 times

Rikki

2 years ago

Yeah, multiplying by 0.90 and adding it for further processing makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylyn

2 years ago

Using AMT* 0.90 ADDWTI in the PCR will help reduce the wage type by 10% and retain it for further processing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

2 years ago

I think Option B is the correct one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tom

2 years ago

I think Option A might work too, multiplying by 0.90 and adding it back in.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sueann

2 years ago

I agree, Option B is the right choice for reducing the amount by 10% in a PCR called by function PIT.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bonita

2 years ago

Option B is correct. Multiplying the wage type by 0.90 and adding it to the input wage type is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Penney

2 years ago

I agree, Option B seems like the correct choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

2 years ago

Option D does seem like a valid choice as well, it's a tough decision

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominque

2 years ago

I believe option D is the correct answer as it reduces the amount by 10% and adds it with the wage type indicator

upvoted 0 times

...

Tora

2 years ago

But option A also adds the reduced amount to the wage type, so it should work too

upvoted 0 times

...

Vashti

2 years ago

Option A looks correct to me. Reducing the wage type by 10% and retaining it for further processing makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

2 years ago

I think option B is the correct one - it reduces the amount by 10% and adds it to the wage type

upvoted 0 times

...

Tora

2 years ago

I would use option A because it reduces the amount by 10% and retains it for further processing

upvoted 0 times

...

Elly

2 years ago

Alright, let's think this through step-by-step. We need to reduce the wage type by 10% and retain it. Option B uses the AMT* 0.90 ADDWTI operation, which seems to do the job. I'm going with that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cory

2 years ago

This question is making my head spin. Is there a 'none of the above' option? I'm starting to feel like I need a calculator and a crystal ball to figure this one out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theola

2 years ago

I'm not feeling too confident about this question. I'm going to have to think it through a bit more. Maybe I'll just guess and hope for the best.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candida

2 years ago

Hmm, this is a tough one. I think I'm going to go with option A. The AMT 0.90 ADDWT* operation looks like it'll reduce the amount by 10% and also retain it for further processing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

2 years ago

I'm not too sure about this one. Reducing the amount by 10% doesn't seem to be the same as multiplying it by 0.90. I'm leaning more towards option C, which uses the AMT 0.10 ADDWT* operation to reduce the amount by 10%.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardine

2 years ago

This is a tricky question. We need to reduce the wage type by 10% and also retain it for further processing. I'm thinking option B might be the right answer, as it uses the AMT* 0.90 ADDWTI operation to reduce the amount by 90% (which is the same as reducing it by 10%).

upvoted 0 times

Alayna

2 years ago

I disagree, I believe option B is the right one - AMT* 0.90 ADDWTI

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordelia

2 years ago

I think option A is correct - AMT 0.90 ADDWT*

upvoted 0 times

...