New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP C_HAMOD_2404 Exam - Topic 6 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_HAMOD_2404 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 6
[All C_HAMOD_2404 Questions]

What are the limitations of using a full outer join in a star join node? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

by Lang at Apr 06, 2025, 09:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_HAMOD_2404 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Stacey
2 months ago
C seems off, I thought it could be anywhere in the node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
3 months ago
D sounds right, only one dimension allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
3 months ago
I disagree with A, I've seen it mixed before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
3 months ago
Wait, is it really restricted to just one dimension?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
3 months ago
A is definitely true, can't mix join types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
3 months ago
I’m pretty confident that only one column can be included in the join condition, but I’m not clear on the other limitation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
4 months ago
I feel like there was a practice question about the order of joins, maybe it has to do with it needing to be the last dimension?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
4 months ago
I remember something about it being restricted to one dimension, but I can't recall if that's the only limitation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
4 months ago
I think one limitation is that a full outer join can't be mixed with other join types in the same star join node, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
4 months ago
I think I've seen this type of question before. If I remember correctly, there are a couple key limitations to be aware of. I'll need to double-check the details, but I'm feeling reasonably confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
4 months ago
I've used full outer joins before, but I'm not as familiar with how they behave in a star join node. I'll need to make sure I understand the differences compared to other join types in that context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know full outer joins can be useful, but I'm not sure how they work in a star join specifically. I'll need to review the concepts around star joins and join types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeann
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the limitations of using a full outer join in a star join node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
9 months ago
Hold on, isn't a full outer join just for when you want to see all the data, even the missing bits? I'm going with B and D, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Mitsue
8 months ago
Good to know! Thanks for clarifying that. It's important to understand the limitations of using a full outer join in a star join node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
8 months ago
Yes, that's correct. Full outer join is used to include all data, so it makes sense that it is restricted to one DIMENSION in a star join node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
9 months ago
I think you're right, a full outer join includes all data from both tables. So, B) Only one column can be included in the join condition and D) It is restricted to one DIMENSION in a star join node are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hailey
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Isn't a full outer join just for those who can't decide between left and right? Anyway, I think A and D are the winners here.
upvoted 0 times
Daisy
8 months ago
Exactly, it's important to remember those limitations when working with star join nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
9 months ago
Yeah, A and D are the correct limitations for using a full outer join in a star join node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
9 months ago
D) It is restricted to one DIMENSION in a star join node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
9 months ago
A) It CANNOT be mixed in the same star join node with other join types.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Coral
10 months ago
I'm going with C and D. The full outer join has to be in the last dimension, and it's restricted to a single dimension. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
9 months ago
Good job! Those are the limitations of using a full outer join in a star join node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
9 months ago
Yes, that's correct. It's also restricted to just one dimension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
10 months ago
I think you're right. The full outer join must be in the last dimension.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Osvaldo
10 months ago
Nah, I'm pretty sure A and D are the right answers. You can't mix a full outer join with other join types in the same star join node, and it's limited to just one dimension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
10 months ago
I believe the correct answers are A) It cannot be mixed with other join types and D) It is restricted to one dimension in a star join node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
10 months ago
I agree with you, Royce. Another limitation is that only one column can be included in the join condition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
10 months ago
I think B and D are the correct answers. A full outer join can only join on one column, and it has to be the last dimension in the star join node.
upvoted 0 times
Angella
8 months ago
So, A and C are not the limitations of using a full outer join.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
8 months ago
And it has to be the last dimension in the star join node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
8 months ago
That's right, a full outer join can only join on one column.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
8 months ago
I agree, B and D are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royce
10 months ago
I think the limitation of using a full outer join in a star join node is that it cannot be mixed with other join types.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel