SAP C_HAMOD_2404 Exam - Topic 3 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_HAMOD_2404 exam

Question #: 22
Topic #: 3

A cube calculation view consumes a dimension calculation view. You rename the design time file of the dimension view but do NOT choose the option to rename the runtime view and adjust the reference. Afterward, you perform the following operations:

* A: Build/deploy the dimension calculation view as a single object.

* B: Build/deploy the entire SAP HANA database module. What is the outcome of the build/deploy operations?

AA is successful.
* Fails.

BA fails.
* B is successful.

CA fails.
* B fails.

DA is successful.
* B is successful.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Ellen at Oct 22, 2024, 04:28 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_HAMOD_2404 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Eleonore

3 months ago

I thought A would still work, but guess not!

upvoted 0 times

...

Angelica

3 months ago

Yup, happened to me too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teddy

3 months ago

Wait, are you sure about that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

4 months ago

Totally agree, renaming messes things up!

upvoted 0 times

...

Hannah

4 months ago

A fails, B is successful.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

4 months ago

I thought we learned that building the dimension view alone would fail, but deploying the whole module could still work. So maybe A fails and B is successful?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

4 months ago

I have a vague recollection that if the dimension view is not properly referenced, it could lead to both A and B failing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like similar practice questions indicated that deploying the entire module might still succeed even if one part fails.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alison

5 months ago

I remember we discussed how renaming the design time file without updating references can cause issues. I think A will fail.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

5 months ago

I've seen similar issues come up before with view references. My gut instinct is that option D is the correct answer, but I'll double-check my understanding to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latanya

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure about this one. The question is a bit ambiguous, and I could see arguments for multiple answers. I'll need to re-read it a few times and think it through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

5 months ago

Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. If I build and deploy the dimension calculation view first, and then the entire database module, I think option C is the most likely outcome.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francesco

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully think through the implications of renaming the design-time file without updating the runtime view reference.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beatriz

1 year ago

I'm feeling lucky today! Let's go with C. Everything's going to fail, just like my love life.

upvoted 0 times

Brunilda

1 year ago

User 3: I'm not so sure about that, but let's see what happens.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawanna

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, let's hope for the best.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carli

1 year ago

User 1: I think C is the right choice. Everything will fail.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barbra

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. What if the runtime view reference is actually required for the database module build to succeed? I'm going to go with B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keith

1 year ago

I agree with Annett. The dimension calculation view needs to be deployed as a single object for A to be successful.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlie

1 year ago

I think the correct answer is D. If the runtime view reference is not updated, the dimension calculation view build should fail, but the overall database module build should still succeed.

upvoted 0 times