Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_HAMOD_2404 Topic 2 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_HAMOD_2404 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 2
[All C_HAMOD_2404 Questions]

What options do you have to handle orphan nodes in your hierarchy? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Janet at Sep 11, 2024, 11:53 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_HAMOD_2404 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Cathern
3 months ago
Option A and C? More like option A and 'See me after class'! Seriously, who wants to deal with that kind of hierarchy spaghetti?
upvoted 0 times
Yuriko
1 months ago
Definitely, option A seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
2 months ago
I think assigning them to a parent determined by an expression is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
2 months ago
I agree, dealing with orphan nodes can be a headache.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yasuko
3 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm going to go with B and C. Putting orphans in a leaf node might be a bit odd, but at least it keeps them contained. And assigning them to an existing root node is simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Micaela
2 months ago
I think B and C are the correct options to handle orphan nodes in the hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
2 months ago
Assigning them to an existing root node is definitely simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
2 months ago
I agree, putting orphans in a leaf node does seem a bit odd, but it does keep them contained.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Danilo
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards A and D. Creating a new root node for orphans could be a clean way to organize them, and using an expression to assign a parent seems flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
4 months ago
Option B and D are just weird. Who would want to assign orphan nodes to a leaf level or define them as additional root nodes? That just seems messy and illogical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
4 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is more versatile in handling different scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the correct answer because it ensures orphan nodes are placed at the appropriate level in the hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
4 months ago
I think option A is correct because it allows for flexibility in assigning orphan nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
4 months ago
I think I'll go with option A and C. Assigning orphan nodes to a parent using an expression and to an existing root node seem like reasonable ways to handle them.
upvoted 0 times
Lemuel
3 months ago
True, assigning them to a leaf level node could limit their visibility in the hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
3 months ago
Defining them as additional root nodes might complicate the hierarchy structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
3 months ago
I think assigning them to an existing node at the root level is also a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
4 months ago
I agree, assigning orphan nodes to a parent determined by an expression can help maintain hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel