I'm pretty sure the correct answer is Option A. It's the only one that makes any sense from a process flow perspective. The others just sound like they were made up by someone who's never actually used these systems.
Ah, Option D, the classic 'do everything in one system' approach. That might work, but then why bother integrating FSM with S/4HANA in the first place? Might as well just use one or the other.
Option C is trying to have it both ways, but that's not going to work. You can't create the request in one system, dispatch and execute in another, and then send confirmations back to the first. That's just asking for trouble.
I'm not sure why Option B is even an option. Why would you create the request in FSM, but then do the dispatch and execution in FSM too? Isn't the whole point of integration to have the work done in S/4HANA?
Option A seems the most logical flow. I mean, why would you create the service request in one system and then dispatch and execute in another? That just sounds like a recipe for confusion and chaos.
Noel
1 months agoMagda
1 months agoLouisa
3 days agoFrederica
6 days agoLeslee
12 days agoHerschel
1 months agoPrecious
12 days agoMozell
16 days agoDetra
25 days agoAshleigh
2 months agoSherita
1 months agoElinore
2 months agoIn
2 months agoSimona
2 months agoVincenza
2 months agoSimona
2 months ago