New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP C_CPI_2506 Exam - Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_CPI_2506 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All C_CPI_2506 Questions]

You want to build an architecture that is largely asynchronous. Which design do you use to exchange notifications between the partners involved?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

You can use an OData adapter to implement a synchronous call to a remote HTTP API as an integration flow component. An OData adapter allows you to send and receive messages using the OData protocol. OData stands for Open Data Protocol and is a standard for exposing and consuming data over HTTP or HTTPS. You can use an OData adapter to communicate with OData services that support CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations on resources.Reference:Integration Software | SAP Integration Suite,Modernize Integration with SAP Integration Suite | openSAP


by Nada at Jul 29, 2025, 06:49 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_CPI_2506 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Zona
2 months ago
I thought serverless was just for scaling, not notifications!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure A is the best? What about C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
3 months ago
I think B could work too, but not as well as A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
3 months ago
A all the way! It’s perfect for decoupling components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
3 months ago
Definitely A, event-driven is the way to go for async!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
3 months ago
Request-driven design seems more synchronous to me, so I would lean towards event-driven for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
4 months ago
Serverless design sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it specifically addresses notifications between partners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about hexagonal design, but I don't think it fits the asynchronous requirement as well as event-driven does.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
4 months ago
I think event-driven design is the right choice here since it focuses on asynchronous communication, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
4 months ago
Okay, I've got this. An event-driven design is definitely the way to go here. It's perfect for exchanging notifications between partners in an asynchronous system. I'll make sure to explain my reasoning clearly in the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
4 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm not as familiar with the different architectural patterns, so I'll need to review my notes on event-driven, hexagonal, and serverless designs to decide which one is most appropriate for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know event-driven design is a common choice for asynchronous systems, but I'm wondering if a serverless design might also be a good fit. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
5 months ago
This looks like a great opportunity to showcase my knowledge of asynchronous design patterns. I'm confident that an event-driven design would be the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel