Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_CPI_2404 Topic 5 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_CPI_2404 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 5
[All C_CPI_2404 Questions]

You want to build an architecture that is largely asynchronous. Which design do you use to exchange notifications between the partners involved?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

You can use an OData adapter to implement a synchronous call to a remote HTTP API as an integration flow component. An OData adapter allows you to send and receive messages using the OData protocol. OData stands for Open Data Protocol and is a standard for exposing and consuming data over HTTP or HTTPS. You can use an OData adapter to communicate with OData services that support CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations on resources.Reference:Integration Software | SAP Integration Suite,Modernize Integration with SAP Integration Suite | openSAP


by Meaghan at Sep 14, 2024, 01:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_CPI_2404 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Mozell
10 months ago
Event-driven design? Psh, what is this, amateur hour? Real architects use quantum entanglement to transmit notifications. Get with the times, people!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
10 months ago
Request-driven design? What is this, the 90s? We're talking about asynchronous architecture here, folks. Event-driven is the clear winner.
upvoted 0 times
Willard
9 months ago
Request-driven design may be outdated for this type of architecture. Event-driven design offers more flexibility and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
10 months ago
I agree, event-driven design allows for better communication between partners without being tied to a specific request-response model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
10 months ago
Event-driven design is definitely the way to go for asynchronous architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denna
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Serverless design could also work for exchanging notifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
10 months ago
Serverless, huh? That's an interesting idea, but I'm not sure it's the best fit for notification exchange. Seems a bit overkill.
upvoted 0 times
Pansy
10 months ago
D) Request-driven design
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
10 months ago
C) Serverless design
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
10 months ago
B) Hexagonal design
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
10 months ago
A) Event-driven design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristofer
11 months ago
I agree with Frederica, event-driven design is the best choice for asynchronous architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) Event-driven design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
11 months ago
Hexagonal design? Really? That's more for managing different interfaces, not notifications. Come on, people, let's get serious here.
upvoted 0 times
Hollis
10 months ago
D) Request-driven design
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
10 months ago
C) Serverless design
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
11 months ago
A) Event-driven design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tenesha
11 months ago
Event-driven design is definitely the way to go for an asynchronous architecture. You get all the benefits of decoupling and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
Willow
10 months ago
True, serverless design can be a cost-effective and efficient way to handle notifications in an asynchronous system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
10 months ago
I think serverless design could also be a good option for exchanging notifications in an asynchronous architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
10 months ago
I agree, event-driven design allows for better scalability and flexibility in handling notifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
11 months ago
Event-driven design is definitely the way to go for an asynchronous architecture. You get all the benefits of decoupling and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
11 months ago
I agree, it allows for decoupling and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
11 months ago
Event-driven design is the best choice for asynchronous architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel