Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_CPI_2404 Topic 1 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_CPI_2404 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 1
[All C_CPI_2404 Questions]

What kind of editor can you use to manipulate integration flows?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To access the message body of the previous Content Modifier step in an integration flow, you must use the notation S{in body) in the current Content Modifier step. This notation means that you want to read the value from the in-message body of the exchange container. The exchange container is used to store additional data besides the message that is being processed by SAP Integration Suite. It has two message containers: in-message and out-message. The in-message contains the original message that was received by the integration flow, while the out-message contains the modified message that will be sent by the integration flow.Reference:Content Modifier Basics | SAP Help Portal,Exchange Container | SAP Help Portal


by Laurel at Jan 22, 2025, 08:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_CPI_2404 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Ashton
18 days ago
Graphical editor for the win! Unless, of course, you're a secret agent trying to hack into a top-secret government database. Then the command-line editor might be your best bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
28 days ago
Graphical editor all the way! Though I do wonder if the developers use the command-line editor just to feel like hackers from the movies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marg
1 months ago
Command-line editor? Really? What is this, the 90s? I'll stick with the graphical editor, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
Ivette
13 hours ago
I agree, graphical editor is much more user-friendly and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
7 days ago
Graphical editor is definitely the way to go for manipulating integration flows.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sarina
1 months ago
Hmm, I'd have to go with the code editor - I'm more of a hands-on kind of guy, and I like to have full control over my integration flows.
upvoted 0 times
Lauran
6 days ago
I like the command-line editor for quick and efficient edits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
23 days ago
I think the graphical editor is easier to use for those who prefer a visual representation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
1 months ago
I prefer the code editor too. It gives me more flexibility and control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zona
2 months ago
I believe a command-line editor can also be used, but it may not be as user-friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
2 months ago
Graphical editor for sure, no need to get my hands dirty with code when I can just drag and drop my components!
upvoted 0 times
Shawnda
8 days ago
I like the command-line editor for quick edits and automation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
8 days ago
I find the graphical editor more user-friendly and intuitive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
28 days ago
I prefer the code editor, gives me more control over the integration flows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
1 months ago
I agree, the graphical editor is much easier to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nancey
2 months ago
I prefer using a code editor for integration flows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
2 months ago
I think you can use a graphical editor.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel