Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_CPI_15 Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_CPI_15 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 1
[All C_CPI_15 Questions]

You want to build an architecture that is largely asynchronous. Which design do you use to exchange notifications between the partners involved?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Phil
11 days ago
Agreed. Hexagonal design and request-driven design don't really fit the bill here. They're more about the application structure, not the communication model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
13 days ago
Hmm, good point. Serverless could work, but I think event-driven design is a more direct and established pattern for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
14 days ago
What about serverless design? Wouldn't that also work well for an asynchronous architecture? It can handle the scalability and event-driven aspects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
15 days ago
I agree, event-driven design is the way to go. It gives us the flexibility to add new partners or modify existing ones without disrupting the entire system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
17 days ago
Definitely, I'm leaning towards option A. Event-driven design is perfect for asynchronous notifications between partners. It allows for loose coupling and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
19 days ago
I think this is a great question to test our understanding of asynchronous architectures. The key here is to identify the design pattern that best facilitates decoupled, event-driven communication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel