B and D, no doubt. I mean, if the question says there are two correct answers, it's probably not going to be the ones that sound like they were made up on the spot.
Wait, there's a dataflow scheduler in the Console? I thought that was just a place to store our cat GIFs. This exam is getting way too technical for my taste.
Hmm, I'm going with A and D. Who needs the console when you can just use the API? Plus, the idx.setDataflow endpoint sounds like it could be fun to play with.
I agree with you, A and D seem like the best options. The API can be more efficient and the idx.setDataflow endpoint could provide some useful functionality.
I prefer B and C actually. The console can be helpful for troubleshooting and the idx.setDataflow endpoint may not be necessary for this configuration.
I think B and C are the way to go. The console's scheduler is the easiest, but using an extension to schedule the dataflow could give you more control.
B and D seem like the best options to me. Using the console's dataflow scheduler and the createScheduling endpoint would be the most straightforward way to configure this.
Jettie
10 months agoAlberta
10 months agoBulah
10 months agoStarr
9 months agoJolanda
10 months agoDaniel
10 months agoKristian
10 months agoArletta
9 months agoVirgie
9 months agoJoanna
9 months agoTrinidad
10 months agoHoward
11 months agoLindsey
10 months agoKami
10 months agoSarah
11 months agoCecil
11 months agoTrina
11 months agoCaprice
11 months agoIlona
11 months agoTrina
11 months ago