Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP C_C4H46_2408 Exam - Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

You need to create an embedded component that is self-container. Data binding and controller logic need to be defined within that embedded component.What type of binding between the parent component and the embedded component would you choose?
C) Loose coupling by inport and outport context mapping
A) Tight coupling by explicit binding
B) Loose coupling by node reference binding
D) Tight coupling by node reference binding

SAP C_C4H46_2408 Exam - Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_C4H46_2408 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 2
[All C_C4H46_2408 Questions]

You need to create an embedded component that is self-container. Data binding and controller logic need to be defined within that embedded component.

What type of binding between the parent component and the embedded component would you choose?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Charlene at Nov 16, 2024, 05:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_C4H46_2408 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Simona
6 months ago
I’m surprised there’s even an option for tight coupling here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
6 months ago
C is the way to go, keeps things flexible!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
7 months ago
Wait, why would you want tight coupling? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
7 months ago
A is definitely better for performance though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
7 months ago
I’d go with C for loose coupling. Makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused about node reference binding versus context mapping. I feel like context mapping could provide more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
7 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think we had a similar practice question about data binding types. I might lean towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
8 months ago
I think loose coupling is generally preferred for embedded components, but I can't recall the specifics about inport and outport context mapping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
8 months ago
I remember we discussed tight coupling in class, but I'm not sure if it's the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident that B is the right answer here. Loose coupling by node reference binding allows the embedded component to maintain its own data binding and logic while still connecting to the parent component. Seems like the best fit for the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
8 months ago
Option C, loose coupling by inport and outport context mapping, sounds interesting. I'll have to think through how that would work to keep the component self-contained. Might be a good strategy to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the difference between the options. I'll need to review the concepts of tight and loose coupling again before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
8 months ago
I think the answer is B. Loose coupling by node reference binding seems like the best approach to keep the embedded component self-contained while still allowing data binding and controller logic to be defined within it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
1 year ago
I can't believe D) is even an option. That's like trying to drive a car with your feet. Just no.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
1 year ago
D) Tight coupling by node reference binding? What is this, the stone age? Come on, people, let's move into the 21st century!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B) and C). Loose coupling is the way to go, but I'm not sure which method is better. Anyone have any thoughts?
upvoted 0 times
Barb
1 year ago
I agree, C) sounds like the most flexible option for data binding between components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
I think C) Loose coupling by inport and outport context mapping would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audria
1 year ago
A) Tight coupling by explicit binding? Nah, that's way too inflexible. I'd avoid that like the plague.
upvoted 0 times
Rebbecca
1 year ago
B) Yeah, tight coupling by explicit binding can make it harder to make changes in the future. Loose coupling is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
1 year ago
A) Tight coupling by node reference binding could work, but I think it's better to go with a more flexible option like loose coupling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
1 year ago
C) I agree, loose coupling by inport and outport context mapping would make the components more reusable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
1 year ago
B) Loose coupling by node reference binding sounds like a better option. It allows for more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Venita
2 years ago
I prefer option A) Tight coupling by explicit binding. It may require more effort, but it provides better control over the data flow between components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
2 years ago
C) Loose coupling by inport and outport context mapping is definitely the way to go. This allows for a clean separation of concerns and makes the component truly self-contained.
upvoted 0 times
Thaddeus
1 year ago
C) Loose coupling by inport and outport context mapping
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
1 year ago
B) Loose coupling by node reference binding
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
1 year ago
A) Tight coupling by explicit binding
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
2 years ago
I agree with Cora. Using inport and outport context mapping allows for better encapsulation and reusability of the embedded component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
2 years ago
I think I would choose option C) Loose coupling by inport and outport context mapping.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel