Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_BW4H_214 Topic 7 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_BW4H_214 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 7
[All C_BW4H_214 Questions]

You have an existing field-based data flow that follows the LSA++ concept. To meet a new urgent business requirement for a field you want to leverage a hierarchy of an existing characteristic without changing the transformation. How can you achieve this? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Delisa at May 18, 2024, 10:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_BW4H_214 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Salome
1 years ago
I'm feeling lucky. I'll go with A and D - let's see if I can surprise the graders with a creative solution!
upvoted 0 times
Eileen
1 years ago
I agree, A seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
1 years ago
I'm not sure about D, but A sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
1 years ago
I think A and D are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ailene
1 years ago
Haha, this question is a real brainteaser! I'm going to go with B and C just to see if I can outsmart the test-makers.
upvoted 0 times
Dyan
1 years ago
Sounds good to me, let's see if we got it right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 years ago
I agree, let's go with those options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
1 years ago
I think B and C are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brinda
1 years ago
I'm torn between B and D. Assigning hierarchy properties in the SW Query might be a more elegant solution, but the DataStore approach sounds like it could be cleaner.
upvoted 0 times
Annamae
1 years ago
I agree, it's a more advanced approach that could work well for your existing data flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
1 years ago
I think B is the way to go. Adding the characteristic to the DataStore object seems like a cleaner solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
1 years ago
I agree, it seems like a cleaner solution compared to assigning hierarchy properties in the SW Query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
1 years ago
I agree, it seems like a cleaner solution compared to assigning hierarchy properties in the SW Query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
1 years ago
I think adding the characteristic to the DataStore object might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
1 years ago
I think adding the characteristic to the DataStore object might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jani
1 years ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Modifying the DataStore object should give us the hierarchy we need without changing the transformation.
upvoted 0 times
Rose
1 years ago
Yes, let's go with option B to meet the new business requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
1 years ago
So, we should go with option B then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
1 years ago
I don't think option A would be as effective in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
1 years ago
But what about option A? Would that work as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
1 years ago
I agree, modifying the DataStore object seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
1 years ago
B) Add the characteristic to the DataStore object (advanced)
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
1 years ago
A) Associate the field with the characteristic in the CompositeProvider
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
1 years ago
I think option B is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel