Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_ARP2P_2308 Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_ARP2P_2308 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 1
[All C_ARP2P_2308 Questions]

Where can a Guided Buying user select suppliers from when creating a non-catalog item requisition? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Belen at Apr 08, 2024, 01:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_ARP2P_2308 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Glen
10 months ago
I don't know, but I heard the answer is always C) No release contract. That's the secret to success in the world of facilities and maintenance spend!
upvoted 0 times
Edna
10 months ago
No, I'm pretty sure it's C) No release contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
10 months ago
I think the answer is D) Release contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tarra
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe I should just ask the Magic 8-Ball for the answer. It's probably more reliable than SAP Ariba's recommendations anyway.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
11 months ago
I'm torn between B) and D), but I'm leaning towards D) just to be on the safe side. Can't go wrong with a release contract, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
11 months ago
D) Release contract seems like the safest bet. It's probably what SAP Ariba recommends for a reason.
upvoted 0 times
Margart
9 months ago
Yeah, SAP Ariba probably recommends it for a good reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
10 months ago
I agree, it seems like the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
10 months ago
I think D) Release contract is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
10 months ago
B) Collaborative requisition can help streamline the buying process as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
10 months ago
A) Non-po invoice is also a good option for facilities and maintenance spend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
10 months ago
D) Release contract seems like the safest bet. It's probably what SAP Ariba recommends for a reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gaynell
11 months ago
I see where you're coming from, But Release contract provides more visibility and compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
12 months ago
I think B) collaborative requisition is the way to go. It sounds like the most efficient option for facilities and maintenance spend.
upvoted 0 times
Olive
10 months ago
In the end, it's important to choose a buying process that aligns with the specific needs and goals of facilities and maintenance spend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
10 months ago
I see the benefits of D) Release contract for establishing clear terms and conditions upfront for facilities and maintenance spend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
10 months ago
B) collaborative requisition allows for better communication and coordination between different departments involved in facilities and maintenance spend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
11 months ago
C) No release contract could lead to potential issues with tracking and approval, so I would lean towards options like B) collaborative requisition or D) Release contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
11 months ago
Non-po invoice might work for smaller purchases, but for facilities and maintenance spend, I would go with a more collaborative approach like B) collaborative requisition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
11 months ago
I think D) Release contract could also be a good option for streamlining the buying process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
11 months ago
D) Release contract is also a good option for ensuring compliance and managing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
11 months ago
I agree, B) collaborative requisition seems like the best choice for facilities and maintenance spend.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Florinda
12 months ago
I personally prefer Non-po invoice for facilities and maintenance spend. It's quicker and more flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
1 years ago
I agree with Release contract ensures proper authorization and control over the spending.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
1 years ago
I think SAP Ariba recommends using Release contract for facilities and maintenance spend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
1 years ago
Honestly, I'm leaning towards 'collaborative requisition' too. It just seems like the most sensible approach for something like facilities and maintenance, where you probably want to get input from multiple stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
Kristal
11 months ago
Non-po invoice could streamline the process and make it more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
12 months ago
I think Release contract might also be a good option for better control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
12 months ago
I agree, collaborative requisition allows for input from different parties.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clorinda
1 years ago
Haha, can you imagine trying to explain the 'non-po invoice' option to your boss? 'Yeah, so we just kinda...bought stuff without a purchase order. Hope that's cool!' I'm gonna go with 'release contract' on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
1 years ago
Oof, 'non-po invoice'? That sounds like a bit of a nightmare. I can't imagine that's the recommended approach, unless they're really trying to make things as difficult as possible for the procurement team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
1 years ago
The 'no release contract' option doesn't seem right to me. Facilities and maintenance are pretty important, so I doubt SAP Ariba would recommend just going with no formal contract in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
1 years ago
I was thinking the 'collaborative requisition' might be the way to go. That sounds like it could involve multiple stakeholders working together to make a purchase, which could be useful for something like facilities and maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
1 years ago
Hmm, this is an interesting one. I'm not too familiar with the SAP Ariba recommendations, but I suppose the 'release contract' option could be a good choice here. It seems to imply some kind of formal agreement, which might be appropriate for facilities and maintenance spend.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel