SAP Exam C_ARP2P_2308 Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_ARP2P_2308 exam

Question #: 14
Topic #: 1

[All C_ARP2P_2308 Questions]

which buying process is recommended by SAP Ariba for facilities and maintenance spend?

ANon-po invoice

Bcollaborative requisition

CNo release contract

DRelease contract

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Belen at Apr 08, 2024, 01:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_ARP2P_2308 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Olive

11 days ago

Honestly, I'm leaning towards 'collaborative requisition' too. It just seems like the most sensible approach for something like facilities and maintenance, where you probably want to get input from multiple stakeholders.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clorinda

13 days ago

Haha, can you imagine trying to explain the 'non-po invoice' option to your boss? 'Yeah, so we just kinda...bought stuff without a purchase order. Hope that's cool!' I'm gonna go with 'release contract' on this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbye

14 days ago

Oof, 'non-po invoice'? That sounds like a bit of a nightmare. I can't imagine that's the recommended approach, unless they're really trying to make things as difficult as possible for the procurement team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janine

15 days ago

The 'no release contract' option doesn't seem right to me. Facilities and maintenance are pretty important, so I doubt SAP Ariba would recommend just going with no formal contract in place.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordelia

17 days ago

I was thinking the 'collaborative requisition' might be the way to go. That sounds like it could involve multiple stakeholders working together to make a purchase, which could be useful for something like facilities and maintenance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herman

19 days ago

Hmm, this is an interesting one. I'm not too familiar with the SAP Ariba recommendations, but I suppose the 'release contract' option could be a good choice here. It seems to imply some kind of formal agreement, which might be appropriate for facilities and maintenance spend.

upvoted 0 times

...