New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP C_ACT_2403 Exam - Topic 9 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_ACT_2403 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 9
[All C_ACT_2403 Questions]

What does the Side-by-Side extensibility option mean?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

C is correct because extensibility based on the SAP Business Technology Platform (BTP) and published APIs is what the Side-by-Side extensibility option means. Side-by-Side extensibility is a type of extensibility that allows customers to create custom applications or extensions that run on a separate platform, such as SAP BTP, and communicate with the SAP S/4HANA system via published APIs. Side-by-Side extensibility enables customers to enhance their SAP S/4HANA solution without modifying the core code or configuration, and to leverage the capabilities of SAP BTP, such as cloud services, development tools, or integration options. Verified Reference:

: [Extensibility Options for SAP S/4HANA], page 9


by Rodolfo at Jul 03, 2024, 02:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_ACT_2403 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Edelmira
3 months ago
C sounds right too, with the focus on BTP and APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
3 months ago
Not sure about that, I thought extensibility was more about integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
3 months ago
Isn't it surprising that they have to maintain two instances?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
4 months ago
Totally agree, B is spot on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
4 months ago
I think it means there are two separate instances for standard and custom code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
4 months ago
I vaguely recall something about reporting and data warehousing, but I don't think that's what Side-by-Side extensibility is about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
4 months ago
I feel like extensibility is more about using the SAP Business Transformation Platform and APIs, which makes me lean towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about SAP S/4HANA extensions, and I think it was related to the integration aspect, so maybe option A is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
5 months ago
I think the Side-by-Side extensibility option refers to having separate instances for standard and custom code, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
5 months ago
Ah, I remember this from the lectures. The side-by-side extensibility option is all about keeping the core SAP S/4HANA system clean and focused on standard functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of these options. I'll need to read through them a few times to make sure I'm picking the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that side-by-side extensibility means extensions are built on published APIs and the SAP Business Transformation Platform, not directly in the core system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
5 months ago
Hmm, the side-by-side extensibility option seems to be about how SAP S/4HANA handles extensions and customizations. I'll need to review my notes on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I understand the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I'm confident I can identify the false statement about EVPN services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Cisco FMC is used for network security, but I'm not too familiar with the specific configuration steps needed for malware file lookup. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
2 years ago
Hmm, C seems the most logical choice. I like how it mentions the use of published APIs - that's key for true extensibility in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
2 years ago
Option A sounds nice, but I'm not sure it captures the full meaning of 'side-by-side' extensibility. I'm leaning towards C as the best answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
2 years ago
Haha, option D is like 'Nah, let's just move all the reporting to a separate data warehouse.' That's a bit overkill for extensibility, I'd say C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Carlota
2 years ago
C) Extensibility is based on the SAP Business Transformation Platform (BTP) and published APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
2 years ago
A) SAP S/4HANA extensions are context-aware and focused on tight integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ena
2 years ago
B seems more like a separate installation of S/4HANA. I'm going with C as well, it sounds like the most comprehensive extensibility approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
2 years ago
I think option C is the correct answer. The extensibility being based on BTP and published APIs makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
2 years ago
Option C all the way! Extensibility based on BTP and APIs is the future. Though I do wonder if the dAlyssalopers had a side-by-side extension in mind when they came up with that name.
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
1 year ago
I wonder if the developers thought about side-by-side extensions when they named it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
2 years ago
Definitely, using BTP and APIs for extensions is the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
2 years ago
I agree, option C is the way to go for extensibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
2 years ago
I think it means reporting is transferred to an enterprise data warehouse based on SAP BW/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
2 years ago
I feel like extensibility is based on the SAP Business Transformation Platform (BTP) and published APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
2 years ago
D, definitely D! Reporting to an enterprise data warehouse based on BW/4HANA is the way to go for sure. Who needs custom extensions anyway?
upvoted 0 times
Mabelle
2 years ago
I prefer option C. Extensibility based on the SAP Business Transformation Platform and published APIs seems more flexible to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
2 years ago
D, definitely D! Reporting to an enterprise data warehouse based on BW/4HANA is the way to go for sure. Who needs custom extensions anyway?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Scarlet
2 years ago
I believe it means there are two SAP S/4HANA instances: one for standard code and another for custom developments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure, but option A sounds the most logical to me. Tight integration and context-awareness are key for extensions in SAP S/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
2 years ago
I think B is the right answer. Having a separate instance for custom developments is a great way to keep the core system clean and maintainable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
2 years ago
I think the Side-by-Side extensibility option means SAP S/4HANA extensions are context-aware and focused on tight integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
2 years ago
Option C seems to be the correct answer. Side-by-side extensibility allows us to extend SAP S/4HANA using the BTP and published APIs, which makes a lot of sense.
upvoted 0 times
Shawnda
2 years ago
That's right, with side-by-side extensibility, we can easily integrate custom developments with SAP S/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
2 years ago
I agree, option C is the correct answer. It's all about using the BTP and APIs for extensibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel