Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_ACT_2403 Topic 9 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_ACT_2403 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 9
[All C_ACT_2403 Questions]

What does the Side-by-Side extensibility option mean?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

C is correct because extensibility based on the SAP Business Technology Platform (BTP) and published APIs is what the Side-by-Side extensibility option means. Side-by-Side extensibility is a type of extensibility that allows customers to create custom applications or extensions that run on a separate platform, such as SAP BTP, and communicate with the SAP S/4HANA system via published APIs. Side-by-Side extensibility enables customers to enhance their SAP S/4HANA solution without modifying the core code or configuration, and to leverage the capabilities of SAP BTP, such as cloud services, development tools, or integration options. Verified Reference:

: [Extensibility Options for SAP S/4HANA], page 9


by Rodolfo at Jul 03, 2024, 02:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_ACT_2403 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jacinta
9 months ago
Hmm, C seems the most logical choice. I like how it mentions the use of published APIs - that's key for true extensibility in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
9 months ago
Option A sounds nice, but I'm not sure it captures the full meaning of 'side-by-side' extensibility. I'm leaning towards C as the best answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
9 months ago
Haha, option D is like 'Nah, let's just move all the reporting to a separate data warehouse.' That's a bit overkill for extensibility, I'd say C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Carlota
8 months ago
C) Extensibility is based on the SAP Business Transformation Platform (BTP) and published APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
8 months ago
A) SAP S/4HANA extensions are context-aware and focused on tight integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ena
9 months ago
B seems more like a separate installation of S/4HANA. I'm going with C as well, it sounds like the most comprehensive extensibility approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
9 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. The extensibility being based on BTP and published APIs makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
9 months ago
Option C all the way! Extensibility based on BTP and APIs is the future. Though I do wonder if the dAlyssalopers had a side-by-side extension in mind when they came up with that name.
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
8 months ago
I wonder if the developers thought about side-by-side extensions when they named it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
8 months ago
Definitely, using BTP and APIs for extensions is the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
9 months ago
I agree, option C is the way to go for extensibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
9 months ago
I think it means reporting is transferred to an enterprise data warehouse based on SAP BW/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
10 months ago
I feel like extensibility is based on the SAP Business Transformation Platform (BTP) and published APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
10 months ago
D, definitely D! Reporting to an enterprise data warehouse based on BW/4HANA is the way to go for sure. Who needs custom extensions anyway?
upvoted 0 times
Mabelle
9 months ago
I prefer option C. Extensibility based on the SAP Business Transformation Platform and published APIs seems more flexible to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
9 months ago
D, definitely D! Reporting to an enterprise data warehouse based on BW/4HANA is the way to go for sure. Who needs custom extensions anyway?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Scarlet
10 months ago
I believe it means there are two SAP S/4HANA instances: one for standard code and another for custom developments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure, but option A sounds the most logical to me. Tight integration and context-awareness are key for extensions in SAP S/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
10 months ago
I think B is the right answer. Having a separate instance for custom developments is a great way to keep the core system clean and maintainable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
10 months ago
I think the Side-by-Side extensibility option means SAP S/4HANA extensions are context-aware and focused on tight integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
10 months ago
Option C seems to be the correct answer. Side-by-side extensibility allows us to extend SAP S/4HANA using the BTP and published APIs, which makes a lot of sense.
upvoted 0 times
Shawnda
9 months ago
That's right, with side-by-side extensibility, we can easily integrate custom developments with SAP S/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
9 months ago
I agree, option C is the correct answer. It's all about using the BTP and APIs for extensibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel