Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP C_ABAPD_2507 Exam - Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_ABAPD_2507 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 2
[All C_ABAPD_2507 Questions]

You have two internal tables itab1 and itab2.What is true for using the expression itab1 = corresponding #( itab2 )? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

The expression itab1 = corresponding #( itab2 ) is a constructor expression with the component operator CORRESPONDING that assigns the contents of the internal table itab2 to the internal table itab1. The following statements are true for using this expression:

B: itab1 and itab2 must have at least one field name in common. This is because the component operator CORRESPONDING assigns the identically named columns of itab2 to the identically named columns of itab1 by default, according to the rules of MOVE-CORRESPONDING for internal tables.If itab1 and itab2 do not have any field name in common, the expression will not assign any value to itab1 and it will remain initial or unchanged1

C: Fields with the same name and the same type will be copied from itab2 to itab1. This is because the component operator CORRESPONDING assigns the identically named columns of itab2 to the identically named columns of itab1 by default, according to the rules of MOVE-CORRESPONDING for internal tables.If the columns have the same name but different types, the assignment will try to perform a conversion between the types, which may result in a loss of precision, a truncation, or a runtime error, depending on the types involved1

The following statements are false for using this expression:

A: Fields with the same name but with different types may be copied from itab2 to itab1. This is not true, as explained in statement C.The assignment will try to perform a conversion between the types, which may result in a loss of precision, a truncation, or a runtime error, depending on the types involved1

D: itab1 and itab2 must have the same data type. This is not true, as the component operator CORRESPONDING can assign the contents of an internal table of one type to another internal table of a different type, as long as they have at least one field name in common. The target type of the expression is determined by the left-hand side of the assignment, which is itab1 in this case.The expression will create an internal table of the same type as itab1 and assign it to itab11


by Brandee at Aug 16, 2025, 05:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_ABAPD_2507 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mose
4 months ago
Definitely C, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
4 months ago
Wait, are you sure about A? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
4 months ago
I think B is also true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
4 months ago
B is the only one that makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
5 months ago
A and C are correct!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about option D; I thought the data types didn’t have to be the same as long as the field names matched.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think option C is right because it mentions both name and type matching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
I'm not so sure about option A; I feel like it might be wrong since types usually have to match.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
5 months ago
I think option B is definitely correct because the fields need to match in name to be copied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
6 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy here. I'll focus on the data type compatibility first, and then consider the field name requirements. Hmm, this is going to require some careful analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Do the tables really need to have at least one field in common? That seems like an odd requirement. I'll need to think this through more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
6 months ago
Ah, I think I've got this one. The key is that the fields don't need to have the same data type, as long as they have the same name. I'll select options A and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
6 months ago
Okay, let me see here. I know the CORRESPONDING # operator copies fields with the same name, but I'm not sure about the type compatibility requirements. I'll need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
6 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the behavior of the CORRESPONDING # operator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
7 months ago
I see your point, but I still think option C is the most accurate based on my understanding of the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
7 months ago
But what about option B? It states that itab1 and itab2 must have at least one field name in common.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is correct because it specifies that fields with the same name and type will be copied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
8 months ago
I think option A is correct because it allows fields with the same name but different types to be copied.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel