Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Service Cloud Consultant Topic 5 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Service Cloud Consultant exam
Question #: 86
Topic #: 5
[All Service Cloud Consultant Questions]

Cloud Kicks (CK) wants to increase the number of articles in its knowledge base while maintaining article quality. CK plans to allow all service agents to create articles.

What should the consultant recommend to create a vetting workflow to reduce the number of low-quality articles?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To maintain article quality while increasing the number of Knowledge articles, implementing an approval process for article creation is recommended. This process allows for the vetting of articles by subject matter experts or managers before publication, ensuring that only high-quality content is made available in the knowledge base.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Elli
11 months ago
Hey CK, if you need help vetting those articles, I know a guy who can 'kick' that process into high gear.
upvoted 0 times
Gary
10 months ago
C) Approval process
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
10 months ago
B) Reports and dashboards
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
10 months ago
A) Flow with notifications
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vannessa
11 months ago
I think reports and dashboards could also be useful in monitoring article quality and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
11 months ago
How about an 'auto-reject' button for any articles written in Comic Sans? Just sayin'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
11 months ago
Option C all the way! Ain't no one got time for sifting through a bunch of low-quality articles. Approval process for the win!
upvoted 0 times
Noelia
10 months ago
I agree, an approval process will save us a lot of time and effort in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
10 months ago
Approval process is definitely the way to go. It will help filter out those low-quality articles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
10 months ago
I think having a vetting workflow in place is crucial for maintaining article quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
10 months ago
I agree, an approval process will save us a lot of time and effort in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
11 months ago
Yeah, it would save a lot of time and effort for everyone involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
11 months ago
Approval process is definitely the way to go. It will help filter out those low-quality articles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
11 months ago
I agree, an approval process would definitely help filter out the low-quality articles.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eun
11 months ago
Notifications and dashboards are good, but they're reactive. An approval process puts quality first from the start. Smart move, CK!
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
12 months ago
I agree, the approval process is key. It's better to have a smaller number of high-quality articles than a bunch of junk. Gotta keep those standards high!
upvoted 0 times
Mary
11 months ago
I agree, the approval process is key. It's better to have a smaller number of high-quality articles than a bunch of junk. Gotta keep those standards high!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
11 months ago
C) Approval process
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
11 months ago
B) Reports and dashboards
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
11 months ago
A) Flow with notifications
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonda
12 months ago
I see your point, User 3. Flow with notifications could definitely help with keeping everyone informed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
12 months ago
Option C looks like the way to go. An approval process would ensure quality control and prevent low-quality articles from cluttering the knowledge base.
upvoted 0 times
Ronny
10 months ago
Option C looks like the way to go. An approval process would ensure quality control and prevent low-quality articles from cluttering the knowledge base.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
10 months ago
C) Approval process
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
10 months ago
B) Reports and dashboards
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
11 months ago
A) Flow with notifications
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nell
12 months ago
But wouldn't a flow with notifications also be helpful in keeping track of article creation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
12 months ago
I agree, having an approval process will help maintain article quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
1 years ago
I think we should recommend an approval process to vet the articles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
1 years ago
That's an interesting idea. The flow with notifications could be a good middle ground, giving agents a sense of ownership while still having a quality check in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
1 years ago
What about the 'Flow with notifications' option? That could be a good compromise, where agents can create articles, but they get flagged for review before going live.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
1 years ago
Yeah, the approval process is probably the best approach. It might be a bit more time-consuming, but it's worth it to ensure the knowledge base stays relevant and helpful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
1 years ago
I'm leaning towards the 'Approval process' option. Having a dedicated team review and approve articles before they're published seems like the most effective way to maintain quality standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
1 years ago
I agree. Allowing all service agents to create articles could be a great way to expand the knowledge base, but without a proper vetting process, we could end up with a lot of low-quality content that confuses customers.
upvoted 0 times
Mertie
11 months ago
A) Flow with notifications
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
11 months ago
C) Approval process
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tresa
1 years ago
This is a good question that tests our understanding of knowledge management and quality control. I think the key here is to find a balance between allowing agents to contribute content and ensuring the overall quality of the knowledge base.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel