Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-218) Exam - Topic 1 Question 9 Discussion

What are the two approaches for calculating scope 2 emissions associated with electricity usage? (2 options)
A) Location-Based
B) Energy-Based
C) Market-Based
D) Grid-Based

Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-218) Exam - Topic 1 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-218) exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 1
[All Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-218) Questions]

What are the two approaches for calculating scope 2 emissions associated with electricity usage? (2 options)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Hillary at May 31, 2023, 02:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-218) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Venita
6 months ago
Totally agree, those are the two!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
7 months ago
Yup, Location-Based is a classic!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
7 months ago
Wait, are we sure about Market-Based? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
7 months ago
I thought it was Energy-Based instead of Market-Based.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
7 months ago
It's definitely Location-Based and Market-Based!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
8 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's Location-Based and Market-Based, but I hope I’m not mixing it up with something else we studied!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
8 months ago
I feel like Grid-Based sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it's actually one of the options for Scope 2 emissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
8 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think Location-Based was one of the answers we discussed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
8 months ago
I think one of the approaches is definitely Market-Based, but I'm not sure about the other one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Are we supposed to use a single method to address both the network anomaly identification and payload capture requirements? I'll need to re-read the question and options more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know it has something to do with damaged disk sectors, but I can't quite remember the exact term. I'll have to think it through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
8 months ago
Oh, COBRA sounds familiar - I think that's the law about continuing health insurance after losing a job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
8 months ago
I've got a good feeling about C. Text Formatting. That seems like the most logical choice for modifying the visual aspects of the datasheet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
1 year ago
Wait, there's more than one way to calculate scope 2 emissions? I thought we just used the 'guess and check' method. Where's the fun in being accurate?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
1 year ago
A and C, no doubt. Location-based and market-based are the two approaches that really light up my life. I bet the other options are just a flash in the pan.
upvoted 0 times
Ona
12 months ago
Location-Based and Market-Based are the top choices for sure. They really help us understand our impact on the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
12 months ago
I agree, those two approaches are the most accurate when it comes to calculating scope 2 emissions. The others just don't measure up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alethea
12 months ago
The other options just don't compare to Location-Based and Market-Based.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
1 year ago
I agree, those two approaches really make a difference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
1 year ago
Location-Based and Market-Based are definitely the way to go. They give us a clear picture of our electricity emissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
1 year ago
Location-Based and Market-Based are definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kate
1 year ago
A and C, all the way! I'm a sucker for anything with the word 'market' in it. Scope 2 emissions? More like scope 2 profits, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Colby
1 year ago
Market-Based sounds interesting, but I think I'll stick with Location-Based for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
1 year ago
I prefer Energy-Based and Grid-Based for calculating scope 2 emissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
1 year ago
Location-Based and Market-Based are the two approaches for calculating scope 2 emissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlene
1 year ago
Actually, it's Location-Based and Market-Based. Energy-Based and Grid-Based are not the correct options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
1 year ago
B and D, baby! Energy-based and grid-based are the real deal. Forget that fancy 'location-based' nonsense, I want the facts and figures straight from the grid!
upvoted 0 times
Earnestine
12 months ago
Yeah, I prefer sticking to the energy and grid data for a more precise calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
12 months ago
Location-Based and Market-Based just don't cut it for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
12 months ago
I agree, those are the most accurate approaches for calculating scope 2 emissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
12 months ago
Energy-Based and Grid-Based are definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
12 months ago
Yeah, energy-based and grid-based methods provide a more direct and precise measurement of emissions from electricity usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pok
1 year ago
I prefer sticking to the basics with energy-based and grid-based approaches for calculating scope 2 emissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
1 year ago
Location-based and market-based may have their place, but when it comes to electricity usage, energy-based and grid-based are more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
1 year ago
I agree, energy-based and grid-based are the way to go for accurate emissions calculations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ezekiel
1 year ago
I believe it's Location-Based and Market-Based.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
1 year ago
I think the two approaches are Location-Based and Energy-Based.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
1 year ago
Actually, the correct answers are Location-Based and Market-Based. Energy-Based and Grid-Based are not the approaches for calculating scope 2 emissions associated with electricity usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
1 year ago
I believe it's Market-Based and Grid-Based.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
1 year ago
I think the two approaches are Location-Based and Energy-Based.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
1 year ago
A and C, of course! Location-based and market-based are the ways to go for scope 2 emissions. Who needs energy-based when you can just play the market?
upvoted 0 times
Argelia
1 year ago
Location-based and energy-based approaches both have their advantages when calculating scope 2 emissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
1 year ago
I think focusing on market-based calculations can provide more accurate results for scope 2 emissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
1 year ago
Energy-based and grid-based are also important to consider when calculating scope 2 emissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
1 year ago
I agree, location-based and market-based are the way to go for scope 2 emissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel