MENU
A Sustainability Manager wants to update the Net Zero Cloud package. How can they ensure that customized fields or Supplemental Emissions are not changed when they update Net Zero Cloud with a new release? (1)
Suggested Answer: B, D
Get Premium Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-218) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
JE
Jess
11 months ago
Not sure about that auto-update thing, sounds risky for custom setups.
MY
Myra
12 months ago
Wait, does Net Zero Cloud really update three times a year? That seems too frequent!
SI
Silva
12 months ago
I think option B is better, having the partner manage it sounds safer.
MI
Milly
12 months ago
Totally agree, option C makes the most sense!
CH
Chauncey
1 year ago
A managed package can be deployed manually and will keep custom fields.
MA
Markus
1 year ago
I thought updates were automatic, but I wonder if that means custom fields are safe. I need to double-check that detail!
ST
Steffanie
1 year ago
I feel like option C sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it specifically mentioned anything about manual deployment.
SA
Santos
1 year ago
I think the answer might be related to how upgrades are handled. There was a practice question about working with partners for custom fields, right?
SH
Sharita
1 year ago
I remember something about managed packages retaining custom fields, but I'm not sure if that's true for every update.
LA
Lashandra
1 year ago
Ah, I see. The question is asking about how to ensure custom fields are not changed when updating a managed package. I think option C is the way to go - a managed package can be deployed manually to maintain those customizations.
LE
Letha
1 year ago
I've dealt with this kind of thing before. I think the key is making sure the package is deployed as a managed package, which should preserve any custom fields. But I'll double-check the options to be sure.
NI
Nichelle
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure the answer has something to do with managed packages, but I'm not totally clear on the details. I'll need to review that concept before deciding.
CY
Cyndy
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the options and how they relate to maintaining custom fields during package updates.
MA
Marsha
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking about how to access the Stack Manager, so I'll need to consider the different management interfaces mentioned in the answer choices.
AL
Alesia
1 year ago
I practiced questions on turbines and their risk assessments, but I'm a bit uncertain if they specifically relate to RBI.
BU
Buck
1 year ago
Editing the OOTB component directly seems risky to me. I feel like we should stick to best practices, but I can't recall if that's a valid approach in this case.
CH
Chauncey
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the details correctly before answering.
VI
Victor
1 year ago
Option D: Just pray the update fairies don't mess with your custom fields. What could possibly go wrong?
LE
Leoma
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, it's important to have a strategy for updating without losing important data.
SO
Son
1 year ago
User 2: Son is right, it's better to have a plan in place to protect custom fields.
PA
Pauline
1 year ago
User 1: Option D sounds risky, I wouldn't want to rely on update fairies.
MI
Minna
2 years ago
Hmm, Option A sounds tempting, but I'm not sure I trust a 'self-maintaining' package. Better safe than sorry, so I'll pick C to be on the safe side.
TE
Teri
1 year ago
Yeah, it's always better to be cautious when it comes to custom fields and updates.
CA
Cassandra
1 year ago
I think it's better to manually deploy the managed package to ensure nothing gets changed.
CA
Cary
1 year ago
I agree, Option C seems like the safest choice to ensure custom fields are maintained.
LA
Latanya
2 years ago
D? Really? Automatic updates three times a year? That's just asking for trouble. I'm sticking with Option C to keep full control over the customizations.
TE
Terrilyn
1 year ago
That makes sense, it's better to be cautious and have control over the updates.
RE
Reena
1 year ago
In that case, we can manually deploy the managed package when we are ready to ensure our custom fields are not affected.
RO
Rosendo
1 year ago
But what if there are critical updates in the new release that we need to implement quickly?
CA
Carlton
2 years ago
I agree, Option C seems like the safest choice to maintain control over custom fields.
MY
Myong
2 years ago
I'm going with Option B. Letting the partner who installed the package handle the upgrade is a good idea. They'll know how to preserve the custom fields and make the transition smooth.
YO
Yoko
1 year ago
That sounds like a smart choice. They'll know how to handle the custom fields.
DA
Dannette
1 year ago
I agree, it's best to let the experts handle it.
DA
Daisy
1 year ago
I think that's a smart choice. They'll have the expertise to handle the update without losing any customizations.
KR
Kris
2 years ago
I agree, having the partner manage the upgrade seems like the safest option.
VI
Vicente
2 years ago
Option C is the way to go. Manually deploying the managed package ensures that the custom fields are maintained during the update process. That's a smart move to avoid any unintended changes.
MA
Makeda
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think C could also be a good option. A managed package can be deployed manually when the customer is ready.
RO
Rosamond
2 years ago
I agree with Becky, it makes sense to rely on the managed package to maintain custom fields.
BE
Becky
2 years ago
I think the answer is A, the managed package will automatically deploy with each release and maintain custom fields.