MENU
Refer to the below exhibit.
A Mule application configures a property placeholder file named config.yaml to set some property placeholders for an HTTP connector.
What is the valid properties placeholder file to set these values?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Developer (Mule-Dev-201) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Correct answer is as below as it follows the correct syntax.
http:
basepath: 'api'
host : 'localhost'
port : '8081'
Mule Doc Reference :https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-runtime/4.3/mule-app-properties-to-configure
38 comments · newest first
JO
Jose
11 months ago
Surprised there's no option with just key-value pairs!
AL
Alyce
11 months ago
B seems off with the colons, should be equals for properties.
DO
Donte
12 months ago
Wait, isn't option D too complex for a simple config?
GL
Glendora
12 months ago
Definitely agree with C, looks clean and straightforward!
MI
Micaela
1 year ago
I think option C is the correct format for property placeholders.
AS
Ashton
1 year ago
Option D seems too complex for a simple property placeholder file. I feel like it might not be the right choice.
LE
Lea
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the indentation rules in YAML. I thought option A might be valid, but it seems off to me.
TY
Ty
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I feel like option B had the right structure with the colons.
LE
Lettie
1 year ago
I think option C looks familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if the syntax is correct for a YAML file.
SH
Shawna
1 year ago
This seems straightforward. I'll carefully read through each option and compare it to the information provided in the question to determine the valid properties placeholder file.
RE
Refugia
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to look at the structure of the options and match it to the YAML format. I think option D is the correct answer based on the nested structure of the properties.
DA
Dawne
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the correct format for the properties placeholder file. I'll need to double-check the YAML syntax to make sure I understand how to properly set the HTTP connector properties.
KR
Kristofer
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward configuration file question. I'll carefully review the options and think about how the properties should be structured in the YAML file.
TH
Thaddeus
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the different formatting styles in the options. I'll need to review the YAML documentation to make sure I understand the expected syntax for this type of configuration file.
MA
Mammie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about the difference between committed and discretionary costs. Let me think this through carefully.
RO
Royce
1 year ago
Reinstalling the HDA driver doesn't seem like a good idea if the peripheral is already failing. I'm leaning towards C.
EL
Elroy
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between Layer 2 and Layer 3 VPN services. I'll have to think this through carefully.
LE
Leigha
2 years ago
Option A? More like option 'Nah' if you ask me. That's just too basic to be a valid solution.
KA
Kathryn
2 years ago
Option C is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. It's just not the right format for this configuration file.
VA
Valentine
2 years ago
C: Option D seems to have the correct structure with the http, basePath, port, and host properties.
AL
Altha
2 years ago
B: I agree, it looks like it's missing the proper syntax for setting property placeholders.
DU
Dustin
2 years ago
A: Option C is definitely not the right format for this configuration file.
GE
Gerald
2 years ago
Option D has a bit too much JSON formatting, it's a bit overkill for this simple task. I'd go with Option B.
EM
Emilio
2 years ago
Yeah, Option B seems like the best choice for this scenario.
AL
Alease
2 years ago
I agree, Option B looks simpler and more straightforward.
CH
Chanel
2 years ago
Yeah, Option B seems like the best choice here.
AN
An
2 years ago
I agree, Option B looks simpler and more straightforward.
LE
Leana
2 years ago
I agree, Option B seems to be the most complete and organized approach to setting the property placeholders.
AD
Adaline
2 years ago
Yeah, Option B looks well-structured and clear.
JA
Jannette
2 years ago
I think Option B is the best choice.
GE
Gerry
2 years ago
Option B looks more comprehensive and structured. It clearly defines the properties for the HTTP connector.
KR
Krystal
2 years ago
Yes, option B provides a clear layout of the properties for the HTTP connector.
GA
Garry
2 years ago
I would go with option B for setting the property placeholders.
YV
Yvette
2 years ago
Yes, option B seems to be the most comprehensive choice.
AR
Arlean
2 years ago
I agree, option B seems to be the most structured and easy to understand.
AD
Adrianna
2 years ago
Option B has the basepath, host, and port clearly defined.
JO
Joanna
2 years ago
I agree, option B looks more structured and organized.
OT
Otis
2 years ago
I think option B is the correct one.