New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Developer (Mule-Dev-201) Exam - Topic 2 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Developer (Mule-Dev-201) exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Developer (Mule-Dev-201) Questions]

Refer to the below exhibit.

A Mule application configures a property placeholder file named config.yaml to set some property placeholders for an HTTP connector.

What is the valid properties placeholder file to set these values?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Correct answer is as below as it follows the correct syntax.

http:

basepath: 'api'

host : 'localhost'

port : '8081'

Mule Doc Reference :https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-runtime/4.3/mule-app-properties-to-configure


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jose
3 months ago
Surprised there's no option with just key-value pairs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
3 months ago
B seems off with the colons, should be equals for properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
3 months ago
Wait, isn't option D too complex for a simple config?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
4 months ago
Definitely agree with C, looks clean and straightforward!
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
4 months ago
I think option C is the correct format for property placeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
4 months ago
Option D seems too complex for a simple property placeholder file. I feel like it might not be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the indentation rules in YAML. I thought option A might be valid, but it seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I feel like option B had the right structure with the colons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
5 months ago
I think option C looks familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if the syntax is correct for a YAML file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
5 months ago
This seems straightforward. I'll carefully read through each option and compare it to the information provided in the question to determine the valid properties placeholder file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to look at the structure of the options and match it to the YAML format. I think option D is the correct answer based on the nested structure of the properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the correct format for the properties placeholder file. I'll need to double-check the YAML syntax to make sure I understand how to properly set the HTTP connector properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward configuration file question. I'll carefully review the options and think about how the properties should be structured in the YAML file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the different formatting styles in the options. I'll need to review the YAML documentation to make sure I understand the expected syntax for this type of configuration file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about the difference between committed and discretionary costs. Let me think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
5 months ago
Reinstalling the HDA driver doesn't seem like a good idea if the peripheral is already failing. I'm leaning towards C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elroy
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between Layer 2 and Layer 3 VPN services. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
2 years ago
Option A? More like option 'Nah' if you ask me. That's just too basic to be a valid solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
2 years ago
Option C is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. It's just not the right format for this configuration file.
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
2 years ago
C: Option D seems to have the correct structure with the http, basePath, port, and host properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
2 years ago
B: I agree, it looks like it's missing the proper syntax for setting property placeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
2 years ago
A: Option C is definitely not the right format for this configuration file.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerald
2 years ago
Option D has a bit too much JSON formatting, it's a bit overkill for this simple task. I'd go with Option B.
upvoted 0 times
Emilio
2 years ago
Yeah, Option B seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
2 years ago
I agree, Option B looks simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
2 years ago
Yeah, Option B seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
2 years ago
I agree, Option B looks simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leana
2 years ago
I agree, Option B seems to be the most complete and organized approach to setting the property placeholders.
upvoted 0 times
Adaline
2 years ago
Yeah, Option B looks well-structured and clear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
2 years ago
I think Option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerry
2 years ago
Option B looks more comprehensive and structured. It clearly defines the properties for the HTTP connector.
upvoted 0 times
Krystal
2 years ago
Yes, option B provides a clear layout of the properties for the HTTP connector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
2 years ago
I would go with option B for setting the property placeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
2 years ago
Yes, option B seems to be the most comprehensive choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
2 years ago
I agree, option B seems to be the most structured and easy to understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
2 years ago
Option B has the basepath, host, and port clearly defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
2 years ago
I agree, option B looks more structured and organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
2 years ago
I think option B is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel