Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Hyperautomation Developer (Mule-Dev-202) Exam - Topic 2 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Hyperautomation Developer (Mule-Dev-202) exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 2

[All Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Hyperautomation Developer (Mule-Dev-202) Questions]

Which API policy can be applied to limit the number of requests an individual client can make to an API?

AClient ID Enforcement

BSpike Control

CRate limiting - SLA-Based

DOAuth 2.0 access token enforcement

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

In Flow Builder, Run and Debug modes have distinct functionalities:

Run Mode:

Executes the flow as it is, allowing you to see the end-to-end execution based on the latest saved version.

Typically used to verify that the flow works as expected under normal conditions.

Debug Mode:

Provides detailed information for each step of the flow, including input and output data, and any errors encountered.

Useful for troubleshooting and identifying issues within the flow, allowing developers to understand how the flow executes and where problems may arise.

Debug mode is specifically designed to aid in diagnosing and fixing issues by providing a granular view of the flow's execution.

Salesforce Flow Builder Documentation

by Deonna at Sep 18, 2024, 05:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Hyperautomation Developer (Mule-Dev-202) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Madonna

3 months ago

I disagree, Rate limiting is the standard approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

3 months ago

Wait, can OAuth 2.0 really limit requests? Seems odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roselle

3 months ago

Definitely Client ID Enforcement for tracking individual users.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlene

4 months ago

I think Spike Control is more effective for sudden bursts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonette

4 months ago

Rate limiting - SLA-Based is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Samuel

4 months ago

I’m leaning towards C, but I vaguely recall that Spike Control also has something to do with managing request loads.

upvoted 0 times

...

Garry

4 months ago

I feel like Client ID Enforcement might be about authentication rather than limiting requests, but I could be wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theola

4 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question, and I think rate limiting is definitely related to controlling request numbers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teri

5 months ago

I think it's either B or C, but I'm not entirely sure which one specifically limits requests per client.

upvoted 0 times

...

OAuth 2.0 access token enforcement could also be a valid option, since that would allow you to control access and limit requests at the token level. But Spike Control does seem like the most direct approach for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaquana

5 months ago

Definitely Spike Control. That's the policy that allows you to set limits on the number of requests a client can make within a certain time frame, right? Seems like the most straightforward solution here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nicholle

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe Client ID Enforcement or Rate limiting - SLA-Based could also work?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ora

5 months ago

I think the answer is Spike Control, since that policy is specifically designed to limit the number of requests a client can make to an API.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rex

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. The key seems to be that the principle is about ensuring privacy doesn't come at the expense of functionality. I'm leaning towards option D, but I'll double-check the wording to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elouise

10 months ago

I hope the exam doesn't have any trick questions like 'How many chickens can fit in an API?' That would really ruffle my feathers!

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

10 months ago

I'm going to go with C) Rate limiting - SLA-Based. It just sounds like the most straightforward way to cap the number of requests from a client.

upvoted 0 times

Elinore

9 months ago

I'm not sure, but A) Client ID Enforcement might also be a valid option for limiting requests.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zana

9 months ago

I think D) OAuth 2.0 access token enforcement could also be a good choice to limit requests.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

9 months ago

I agree, C) Rate limiting - SLA-Based seems like the best option to control the number of requests.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

10 months ago

B) Spike Control could also be a valid answer, as it helps regulate the incoming traffic to an API and prevent spikes in usage.

upvoted 0 times

Ma

8 months ago

C) Rate limiting - SLA-Based

upvoted 0 times

...

Victor

9 months ago

B) Spike Control

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgeanna

9 months ago

A) Client ID Enforcement

upvoted 0 times

...

Bulah

10 months ago

D) OAuth 2.0 access token enforcement sounds like a good option too, but I'm not sure if it's specifically for limiting the number of requests.

upvoted 0 times

Graham

10 months ago

C) Rate limiting - SLA-Based is another option to restrict the number of requests a client can make.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnetta

10 months ago

A) Client ID Enforcement can be used to limit the number of requests an individual client can make to an API.

upvoted 0 times

...

Frankie

11 months ago

I think the correct answer is C) Rate limiting - SLA-Based. This policy allows you to set limits on the number of requests a client can make to an API.

upvoted 0 times