Salesforce AI Associate Exam - Topic 4 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce AI Associate exam

Question #: 30
Topic #: 4

[All Salesforce AI Associate Questions]

A financial institution plans a campaign for preapproved credit cards?

How should they implement Salesforce's Trusted AI Principle of Transparency?

ACommunicate how risk factors such as credit score can impact customer eligibility.

BFlag sensitive variables and their proxies to prevent discriminatory lending practices.

CIncorporate customer feedback into the model's continuous training.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

''Flagging sensitive variables and their proxies to prevent discriminatory lending practices is how they should implement Salesforce's Trusted AI Principle of Transparency. Transparency is one of the Trusted AI Principles that states that AI systems should be designed and developed with respect for clarity and openness in how they work and why they make certain decisions. Transparency also means that AI users should be able to access relevant information and documentation about the AI systems they interact with. Flagging sensitive variables and their proxies means identifying and marking variables that can potentially cause discrimination or unfair treatment based on a person's identity or characteristics, such as age, gender, race, income, or credit score. Flagging sensitive variables and their proxies can help implement Transparency by allowing users to understand and evaluate the data used or generated by AI systems.''

by Tuyet at Sep 16, 2024, 11:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce AI Associate Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Penney

3 months ago

B should be a priority to ensure fairness in lending practices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

3 months ago

Wait, are they really going to be transparent about risk factors?

upvoted 0 times

...

Goldie

3 months ago

C sounds good, but how often will they actually listen to feedback?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ming

4 months ago

Totally agree with B! Discrimination in lending is a huge issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raul

4 months ago

A is key! Customers need to know how their scores affect them.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

4 months ago

Option C seems relevant too, especially about incorporating feedback, but I’m not clear on how that ties directly to transparency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matthew

4 months ago

I feel like option A is a strong choice since communicating risk factors is crucial for customer understanding, but I could be wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuriko

4 months ago

I think option B makes sense because it addresses discrimination, but I wonder if it fully captures the essence of transparency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amos

5 months ago

I remember discussing the importance of transparency in lending practices, but I'm not sure which option best aligns with that principle.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuki

5 months ago

This is a tricky one. There are a few different angles we could take on the Transparency principle. I'm leaning towards Option A, since clearly communicating the risk factors makes the most sense to me. But I could see the argument for Option B as well. Might be worth double-checking the details before committing to an answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thurman

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The question is asking us to apply the Transparency principle, so we want to make sure the credit card process is as clear and explainable as possible to customers. Option C about incorporating customer feedback seems like a smart way to do that. I'll go with that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristofer

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. There are a few different ways we could approach the Transparency principle here. Option B about flagging sensitive variables seems relevant, but I'm not totally sure if that's the best way to go. I'll have to think it through a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyndia

5 months ago

This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to focus on the Trusted AI Principle of Transparency that Salesforce recommends. Option A looks like the best approach to me - clearly communicating how risk factors like credit score can impact eligibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jettie

5 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Based on the details provided, option A seems like the best approach. Implementing a serviceUnavailableException exception handler to execute fallback code sounds like the most direct way to add the required fault tolerance capabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elfriede

1 year ago

Ah, the eternal struggle of balancing transparency and efficiency. Maybe they could just roll the dice and call it a day?

upvoted 0 times

Hoa

1 year ago

C) Incorporate customer feedback into the model's continuous training.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

1 year ago

B) Flag sensitive variables and their proxies to prevent discriminatory lending practices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodney

1 year ago

A) Communicate how risk factors such as credit score can impact customer eligibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Belen

1 year ago

As long as the model doesn't discriminate, who cares about transparency? Just give me the card and let me max it out!

upvoted 0 times

...

Carylon

1 year ago

Option C is interesting, but I'm not sure how practical it would be to continuously retrain the model based on customer feedback. A and B seem more realistic.

upvoted 0 times