Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Public Sector Solutions Accredited Professional (AP-222) Exam - Topic 2 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Public Sector Solutions Accredited Professional (AP-222) exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 2
[All Public Sector Solutions Accredited Professional (AP-222) Questions]

A government agency does not have a universal requirement for storing a grantee's data after a grant has been fully disbursed and closed. Some grantees may ask to have their data maintained if involved in legal proceedings.

How can a government agency best comply with the grantee's request for historical data storage while at the same time adhering to the request not to use/process the historical data?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To comply with the grantee's request for historical data storage while adhering to the restriction on data processing, the best approach is to keep the data within Salesforce but make it inaccessible to users and the system for processing. This can be achieved by implementing strict access controls and visibility settings, possibly leveraging Salesforce's data access and security models such as record-level access, field-level security, and sharing rules. This method ensures that the data remains within the Salesforce ecosystem for reference, should it be needed for legal proceedings, but is not actively processed or visible in day-to-day operations. This approach aligns with Salesforce's robust data security and privacy features, allowing organizations to maintain compliance with data protection regulations while retaining necessary data.


by Broderick at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Public Sector Solutions Accredited Professional (AP-222) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jerry
2 days ago
I lean towards D. Exporting and deleting keeps things clean and compliant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
7 days ago
Option C sounds good too. Inactive records can be stored without interference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
12 days ago
I prefer option A. Exporting ensures we have a backup without risking processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
17 days ago
I think option B is the safest. Keeps data hidden but still accessible if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
23 days ago
Totally agree with B, invisible data is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
28 days ago
A is a straightforward approach, but what about security?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
1 month ago
Wait, can they really just delete data like that? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 month ago
I think D is the best choice. Deleting from Salesforce keeps it clean!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
1 month ago
Option B sounds like a solid plan to keep it safe but not usable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
2 months ago
Wait, so they want to keep the data but not use it? Sounds like a classic government bureaucracy problem to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go! Keeping the data in Salesforce but making it invisible is the perfect solution. Gotta love a good workaround.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure any of these options are truly foolproof. Seems like a tricky situation where the agency needs to balance data retention and privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
3 months ago
Option D is a bit risky. Exporting the data and then deleting it from Salesforce could lead to potential data loss or issues down the line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
3 months ago
I like option C. Assigning the data to a specific public group and making those records inactive would effectively archive the data without deleting it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
3 months ago
Option B seems like a good compromise. Keeping the data in Salesforce but making it invisible to users and the system would allow the agency to retain the historical data without processing it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
3 months ago
I recall that making records inactive could be a way to limit access, but I'm not clear on how that affects the legal requirements for data storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
3 months ago
I think exporting the data and then deleting it from Salesforce might be a safe way to ensure compliance, but I wonder if that really meets the grantee's request.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
4 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced about data archiving. I think keeping the data in Salesforce but making it invisible could work, but I'm not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
4 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of data retention policies, but I'm not sure which option best balances compliance and data processing restrictions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C. Assigning the data to a specific public group and making those records inactive seems like a good way to comply with the request to retain the data without actually using or processing it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettye
4 months ago
Option D seems like the most straightforward solution to me. Export the data to retain it, then delete it from Salesforce. That way, we have the data stored externally, but it's not taking up space or being used in our system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
4 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think option B might be the best approach - keeping the data in Salesforce but making it invisible to users and the system. That way, we can retain the historical data as requested, but prevent it from being accessed or processed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. It seems like we need to find a way to store the data without actually processing or using it. I'm not sure if any of these options fully address that requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel