Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Plat-UX-102 Exam - Topic 2 Question 5 Discussion

Cloud Kicks is excited about a new customer self-service initiative. Within the stakeholder team, a support manager has shared features they want to recreate from their previous system; a product manager wants to implement new features that were not available in their previous system. There is a concern that conflicting demands may lead to organizational paralysis on the project. What should the strategy designer recommend to stakeholders to remediate risks?
B) Revisit customer research to inform internal prioritization.
A) Map features between the two systems and let stakeholders prioritize.
C) Advise executive leadership to make the decision about priorities.

Salesforce Plat-UX-102 Exam - Topic 2 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Plat-UX-102 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 2
[All Plat-UX-102 Questions]

Cloud Kicks is excited about a new customer self-service initiative. Within the stakeholder team, a support manager has shared features they want to recreate from their previous system; a product manager wants to implement new features that were not available in their previous system. There is a concern that conflicting demands may lead to organizational paralysis on the project. What should the strategy designer recommend to stakeholders to remediate risks?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

When internal stakeholders disagree based on personal preference, grounding the prioritization decision back in customer research provides an objective, customer- centered tiebreaker rather than escalating or simply merging feature wish-lists. In the Platform Strategy Designer context, this question belongs primarily to Intangible Deliverables. In Intangible Deliverables, the strategy designer creates alignment, trust, shared understanding, ethical awareness, and persuasive communication so that people can make coordinated decisions around the intended future state. Here, Revisit customer research to inform internal prioritization. is the strongest choice because it most directly matches the outcome, constraint, or decision described in the scenario. The other choices may be useful in a different stage or for a different question, but they do not address the central requirement as directly. Map features between the two systems and let stakeholders prioritize. focuses attention elsewhere, while Advise executive leadership to make the decision about priorities. addresses a related concern without providing the same fit to the scenario's stated objective. That distinction is important on the exam: select the method or capability that resolves the specific uncertainty in the scenario rather than the option that is merely plausible in a broader project.

Study Guide Topics: Intangible Deliverables

Official Salesforce Reference: Alignment as a Strategic Craft - Gain Alignment

================================================================


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jaleesa
1 day ago
I think revisiting customer research could really help clarify what features are most valuable. It seems like a solid approach to avoid conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
7 days ago
I remember we discussed the importance of aligning stakeholder priorities, but I'm not sure if mapping features is the best first step.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel