Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Plat-Dev-301 Exam - Topic 2 Question 6 Discussion

Posted by Nilsa on Jul 22, 2026 at 05:04 AM

To avoid duplicating code and improve maintainability, how should Universal Containers implement an API integration for code reuse?

Suggested Answer: A

Comprehensive and Detailed 1

The fundamental principle of DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) in Apex development dictates that logic used in multiple places should be centralized. For API integrations, this typically invo2lves creating a Utility or Service Class (Option A).

This class handles the common 'plumbing' of the integration:

Retrieving Named Credentials.

Setting headers (Content-Type, Timeout).

Standardizing error handling and logging.

Serializing and deserializing JSON payloads.

By invoking this central class from various triggers, batch jobs, or controllers, the developer ensures that any change to the API (such as a version update or header change) only needs to be made in one place. Option B leads to 'class sprawl' and duplicate boilerplate code. Option C is incorrect as Static Resources cannot contain executable Apex code. Option D is the definition of poor maintainability.


Get Premium Plat-Dev-301 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
LE
Lera 1 month ago
B seems okay too, but it could get messy with too many classes. A is simpler.
LE
Leontine 2 months ago
I agree, A makes sense. It avoids duplication and keeps things clean.
HE
Herschel 2 months ago
I think A is the best choice. Reusable classes are key for maintainability.
LU
Luz 2 months ago
Wait, people actually consider D)? That's wild!
YO
Youlanda 2 months ago
D) is just asking for trouble, no way!
CY
Cyndy 2 months ago
C) seems like a bad idea, static resources can be tricky.
CO
Corinne 2 months ago
I disagree, B) makes more sense for clarity.
ZO
Zona 3 months ago
A) is definitely the best choice for reusability.
AD
Adell 3 months ago
Including the API code directly in each class (option D) seems like a bad idea for maintainability, but I wonder if anyone would actually choose that option.
HA
Harrison 3 months ago
I feel like storing the API code as a static resource (option C) could lead to issues with updates and maintenance, but I can't recall the specifics.
CH
Charlesetta 3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question where using separate classes for each endpoint seemed to complicate things, so maybe option B isn't the best choice.
OW
Owen 3 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense since it promotes code reuse by having a single class for the API integration.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel