Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Plat-Arch-205 Exam - Topic 3 Question 3 Discussion

Universal Containers is implementing Sales Cloud. During the final quarter of the financial year, sales managers help each other close deals. They requested a solution in Salesforce to allow them to share opportunities with other sales managers from different teams as needed. They also requested that sharing deals should expire automatically 2 weeks after the new fiscal year starts. Which proposed solution meets the requirements?
B) Scheduled Apex job to remove access
A) Apex sharing to share opportunities with sales managers
C) Sharing rules to share opportunities with sales managers

Salesforce Plat-Arch-205 Exam - Topic 3 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Plat-Arch-205 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 3
[All Plat-Arch-205 Questions]

Universal Containers is implementing Sales Cloud. During the final quarter of the financial year, sales managers help each other close deals. They requested a solution in Salesforce to allow them to share opportunities with other sales managers from different teams as needed. They also requested that sharing deals should expire automatically 2 weeks after the new fiscal year starts. Which proposed solution meets the requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect/Course Guide/topics:

The decisive requirement is that temporary deal access must expire automatically at a known future date. Salesforce sharing mechanisms such as manual or Apex-created shares can grant the temporary access, but a standard share entry does not carry an automatic expiration date. A Scheduled Apex job can therefore implement the lifecycle requirement by running after the specified fiscal-year date and removing only the temporary shares that were created for this collaboration program. Apex sharing by itself describes how access could be granted but not how it expires, while a sharing rule is population-based and is poorly suited to temporary per-deal collaboration with individual expiration. A production design should mark the temporary grants in a reliable way so the scheduled process removes only those shares and leaves ownership, hierarchy, teams, and unrelated sharing intact. Study Guide reference: Access to Records - temporary record sharing, Apex/manual shares, scheduled revocation, share lifecycle, and least-privilege collaboration.

===============


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Harrison
1 day ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about Apex sharing being more flexible. Could that be a better option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
7 days ago
I think option C might be the right choice since sharing rules can be set up to share opportunities with specific users or roles.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel