Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Plat-Arch-205 Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

A banking company wants their customers Date of Birth Field searchable by Banking Reps, but only editable by Customer Support Reps. Which approach is recommended to meet this requirement?
C) Set the Field Level Security for the Date of Birth field to be Visible to Customer Support Rep Profile, and set the Date of Birth field Visible and Readonly to Banking Rep profile.
A) Add Date of Birth field to the Search layout of the Contact Object. Modify the Page layout assigned to Customer Support Rep and add Date of Birth field as Required.
B) Create a Validation rule in the Date of Birth field so the rule returns true only when user.profilename matches Customer Support Rep.

Salesforce Plat-Arch-205 Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Plat-Arch-205 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All Plat-Arch-205 Questions]

A banking company wants their customers Date of Birth Field searchable by Banking Reps, but only editable by Customer Support Reps. Which approach is recommended to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect/Course Guide/topics:

Field-Level Security is the authoritative mechanism because Banking Reps must be able to see the Date of Birth value while Customer Support Reps must additionally be able to edit it. Configuring the field as Visible but Read-Only for Banking Reps and Visible/Edit for Customer Support Reps enforces the requirement across Salesforce interfaces rather than only on one page. Search layouts and page layouts are presentation controls; they cannot override restrictive FLS and should not be used as the sole security boundary. A validation rule tied to a profile name would be brittle, would not address field visibility, and would embed authorization logic in a business rule that becomes difficult to maintain. The architect should implement the field permissions through the organization's profile/permission-set strategy and verify that no other permission set grants unintended edit access. Study Guide reference: Permissions to Standard Objects, Custom Objects, and Fields - Field-Level Security, search visibility, read-only fields, profiles, permission sets, and enforceable field authorization.

===============


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Billi
1 day ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about validation rules. Option B might not work because it doesn't really restrict editing, just checks the profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
7 days ago
I think option C sounds familiar from our practice sessions. It seems like the best way to control visibility and edit access based on user profiles.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel