Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Plat-Admn-202 Exam - Topic 4 Question 4 Discussion

Which two solutions prevent a formula field from being referenced by a Roll-Up Summary Field?
B) A cross-object field reference in the formula field and D) The NOW () function in the formula field
A) A cross-object workflow updating a field referenced by the formula field
C) The CASE () function in the formula field

Salesforce Plat-Admn-202 Exam - Topic 4 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Plat-Admn-202 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 4
[All Plat-Admn-202 Questions]

Which two solutions prevent a formula field from being referenced by a Roll-Up Summary Field?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

A formula field cannot be referenced by a roll-up summary field if it contains a cross-object field reference or a time-based function. A cross-object field reference is a reference to a field from a different object, such as Account. Name on a Contact object. A time-based function is a function that returns the current date or time, such as NOW() or TODAY(). Option A and C do not prevent a formula field from being referenced by a roll-up summary field.


by Brandee at Dec 18, 2025, 01:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Plat-Admn-202 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Florinda
2 months ago
I lean towards B and C. The CASE() function adds complexity too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
2 months ago
A is a solid choice. Workflow updates can mess with formula fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
3 months ago
D seems tricky. The NOW() function shouldn't affect referencing, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
3 months ago
I agree with B. Cross-object references definitely cause issues with Roll-Up Summary Fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
3 months ago
I feel like A and C could also be valid. They change how the formula works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
3 months ago
I think B and D are the right answers. Cross-object references can complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
3 months ago
Nope, CASE() is not an issue, just the cross-object stuff!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
4 months ago
I thought the CASE() function was fine for roll-ups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
4 months ago
Wait, the NOW() function too? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
4 months ago
Totally agree, that makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
4 months ago
A cross-object field reference in the formula field prevents it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
4 months ago
I'm with David on this one. The NOW() function is about as useful for this problem as a chocolate teapot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
5 months ago
Haha, the NOW() function in option D? That's like using a hammer to fix a leaky faucet. Totally irrelevant!
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
5 months ago
The NOW() function in option D? Really? That's just a date/time function, not a solution to the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
5 months ago
The CASE() function in option C is not the right solution. That's just a regular function in a formula field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
6 months ago
I think option A is also a valid solution. A cross-object workflow updating a field referenced by the formula field can prevent it from being used in a Roll-Up Summary Field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
6 months ago
Option B is the correct answer. A cross-object field reference in the formula field prevents it from being referenced by a Roll-Up Summary Field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the cross-object workflow part; does that really prevent the roll-up from referencing the formula field?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
6 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question similar to this in practice exams, and I think the CASE() function was mentioned as an issue too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
6 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about the NOW() function being problematic in formula fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
6 months ago
Alright, time to put on my thinking cap. I'll start by analyzing each of the options and how they could prevent the formula field from being referenced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
7 months ago
I've seen questions like this before. I think the key is to focus on the specific solutions mentioned and how they might impact the formula field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review the concepts around formula fields and Roll-Up Summary Fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
7 months ago
I think option B might be one of the answers since cross-object references can complicate roll-up summaries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
7 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key is understanding what can prevent a formula field from being referenced by a Roll-Up Summary Field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
7 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Samira
9 days ago
I feel like D is a safe bet to rule out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
14 days ago
A could work too, but I’m not sure about C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
19 days ago
Yeah, B makes sense. What about A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
24 days ago
I think B is definitely one of them.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel