Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Nonprofit Cloud Consultant Topic 4 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Nonprofit Cloud Consultant exam

Question #: 97
Topic #: 4

[All Nonprofit Cloud Consultant Questions]

A nonprofit organization is using NPSP to manage its contacts and their families. What should the consultant recommend about adding other common connections such as siblings and deceased and divorced spouses?

AAdd them as Relationship entries manually

BAdd them as Relationship record types

CAdd them as Affiliation entries manually

DAdd them as Affiliation record types

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

To quickly query data across multiple systems and get insights on any device about the impact the nonprofit is having, the consultant should recommend:

CRM Analytics (formerly known as Tableau CRM or Einstein Analytics):

CRM Analytics allows for advanced data analysis, visualization, and reporting. It can integrate data from multiple Salesforce objects and external sources, providing comprehensive insights across systems. It is designed to work seamlessly on various devices, ensuring accessibility and usability.

by Bev at Aug 27, 2024, 08:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Nonprofit Cloud Consultant Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Hermila

1 months ago

Relationship record types all the way, baby! B is the only option that makes sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Detra

1 months ago

Ha! Deceased and divorced spouses, eh? Sounds like a soap opera. But seriously, I'm going with B as well.

upvoted 0 times

Beata

1 days ago

C: I agree, it's important to have clear distinctions for different types of relationships.

upvoted 0 times

...

Whitney

4 days ago

B: Yeah, that makes sense. It would keep things organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rene

11 days ago

A: Add them as Relationship record types

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Karma

2 months ago

Whoa, this is a tricky one! I'm leaning towards B, but I'd love to hear what the other candidates think.

upvoted 0 times

Latricia

1 months ago

I agree, B seems like the most efficient way to manage those connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Augustine

2 months ago

I think B is the best option, it would make it easier to track different types of relationships.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Stefan

2 months ago

I prefer adding them as Affiliation entries manually, it gives more flexibility in managing the connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gary

2 months ago

C looks tempting, but I'm not sure that manual Affiliation entries are the best way to go. B sounds like the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gregg

2 months ago

I agree with Tayna, adding them as Relationship record types would make it easier to manage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozelle

2 months ago

I think the answer is B. Adding them as Relationship record types seems like the most logical and scalable approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tayna

2 months ago

I think we should add them as Relationship record types.

upvoted 0 times

...