Discuss Salesforce Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Integration Architect (Mule-Arch-202) Exam Topic 9 Question 48

The implementation of a Process API must change. What is a valid approach that minimizes the impact of this change on API clients?

AImplement required changes to the Process API implementation so that whenever possible, the Process API's RAML definition remains unchanged

BUpdate the RAML definition of the current Process API and notify API client developers by sending them links to the updated RAML definition

CPostpone changes until API consumers acknowledge they are ready to migrate to a new Process API or API version

DImplement the Process API changes in a new API implementation, and have the old API implementation return an HTTP status code 301 - Moved Permanently to inform API clients they should be calling the new API implementation

Suggested Answer: A

* Option B shouldn't be used unless extremely needed, if RAML is changed, client needs to accommodate changes. Question is about minimizing impact on Client. So this is not a valid choice.

* Option C isn't valid as Business can't stop for consumers acknowledgment.

* Option D again needs Client to accommodate changes and isn't viable option.

* Best choice is A where RAML definition isn't changed and underlined functionality is changed without any dependency on client and without impacting client.

Get Premium Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Integration Architect (Mule-Arch-202) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

14 comments · newest first

Tyra 23 hours ago

Wait, a 301 status code? Isn't that a bit confusing for clients?

Kenny 6 days ago

B is better, at least clients know what's up!

Domonique 11 days ago

Not sure about A, what if clients need new features?

Margo 16 days ago

Totally agree, A is the way to go!

Shawana 22 days ago

A) keeps things stable for clients.

Rickie 27 days ago

A) makes sense, but can it really be done without issues?

Brendan 1 month ago

D) 301 status code? That's a bit surprising, isn't it?

Mica 1 month ago

C) sounds like a recipe for disaster. Just update already!

Zana 1 month ago

B) is just too much work for everyone involved.

Patrick 2 months ago

A) keeps things stable for clients. Smart move!

Juan 2 months ago

Option D sounds interesting, but using a 301 status code might confuse some clients. I wonder if they would actually follow the redirect properly.

Merlyn 2 months ago

I remember a practice question where we discussed notifying clients about updates. So, option B seems like a reasonable approach, but it might not be enough.

Lorrine 2 months ago

I'm not sure about option C; it feels risky to postpone changes indefinitely. But I guess it could work if clients really need more time.

Yong 2 months ago

I think option A makes sense because keeping the RAML definition unchanged would help avoid breaking changes for clients.

Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Integration Architect (Mule-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 9 Question 48 Discussion