MENU
An organization is designing a Mule application to periodically poll an SFTP location for new files containing sales order records and then process those sales orders. Each sales order must be processed exactly once.
To support this requirement, the Mule application must identify and filter duplicate sales orders on the basis of a unique ID contained in each sales order record and then only send the new sales orders to the downstream system.
What is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) Anypoint connector, validator, or scope that can be configured in the Mule application to filter duplicate sales orders on the basis of the unique ID field contained in each sales order record?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Integration Architect (Mule-Arch-202) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
SO
Soledad
11 months ago
Not sure about B, seems like overkill for this task.
CH
Chanel
11 months ago
Wait, can D really handle duplicates effectively?
NA
Nakisha
12 months ago
Definitely going with C, it’s designed for this!
SA
Sang
12 months ago
I think A could work too, but not as efficiently.
EL
Elliott
1 year ago
C is the best choice for filtering duplicates!
SH
Shawana
1 year ago
I feel like the watermark option could be useful, but I’m not clear on how it would filter duplicates based on the order ID.
CA
Cassi
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we used a Database connector for filtering. I wonder if that’s the best approach here as well.
GL
Gladys
1 year ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think the Cache scope might work too. It could store the order IDs, but does it handle duplicates effectively?
LU
Lura
1 year ago
I remember studying about the Idempotent Message Validator; it seems like the right choice for ensuring each sales order is processed exactly once.
TR
Trinidad
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. What does it mean by "idiomatic" in this context? I'm not sure if that's a term I'm familiar with. I'll have to read through the options carefully and try to understand the intent behind the question.
PE
Peggy
1 year ago
The Idempotent Message Validator seems like the obvious choice here. It's designed specifically for handling duplicate messages, which is exactly what we need to do in this case. I feel pretty confident about this one.
OL
Olene
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The Cache scope or the Database connector could also potentially work, but I'm not sure if they would be considered the most "idiomatic" solution. I'll have to think this through carefully.
NI
Nickole
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think the Idempotent Message Validator component would be the most idiomatic choice here to filter the duplicate sales orders based on the unique ID field.
MA
Mari
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident the virtual server configurations would be in the bigip.conf file. That's where I've always found the main configuration settings for the BIG-IP.
DE
Delila
1 year ago
The Idempotent Message Validator is the way to go. It's like a superhero for your Mule app, able to leap tall piles of duplicate records in a single bound!
PR
Providencia
1 year ago
A watermark in the On New or Updated File event source? That's a bit of a stretch. I don't think that's the best approach for this use case.
HO
Hollis
1 year ago
The Idempotent Message Validator component is definitely the most idiomatic choice here. It's designed specifically for deduplicating messages based on a unique identifier.
LY
Lynda
1 year ago
Configuring a Cache scope or a Database connector might work, but the Idempotent Message Validator is more idiomatic for this scenario.
LY
Lynda
1 year ago
It makes sense to use a component specifically designed for deduplicating messages to ensure each sales order is processed exactly once.
LY
Lynda
1 year ago
I agree, the Idempotent Message Validator component is the best choice for filtering duplicate sales orders based on the unique ID.
ME
Melvin
1 year ago
Using a Database connector to store and filter records by the order ID makes sense, but it might add unnecessary complexity to the application. We should explore simpler options first.
SY
Sylvie
1 year ago
Using a Cache scope or Idempotent Message Validator would be a simpler and more efficient solution.
MA
Malcom
1 year ago
C) Configure an Idempotent Message Validator component to filter each record by the order ID
AL
Alline
1 year ago
A) Configure a Cache scope to filter and store each record from the received file by the order ID
GR
Gracia
2 years ago
The Cache scope seems like a reasonable option to filter duplicate records based on the unique ID field. It would allow us to store and check each record against the cache.
GW
Gwenn
1 year ago
D) Configure a watermark In an On New or Updated File event source to filter unique records by the order ID
DE
Delila
1 year ago
The Cache scope is a good choice for filtering out duplicate sales orders based on the unique ID field.
SH
Sherron
1 year ago
C) Configure an Idempotent Message Validator component to filter each record by the order ID
RE
Reita
1 year ago
A) Configure a Cache scope to filter and store each record from the received file by the order ID
CA
Casandra
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) Configure a Cache scope could also work to filter and store each record by the order ID. What do you guys think?
EU
Eugene
2 years ago
I agree with Alberta. Using an Idempotent Message Validator would be the most idiomatic way to filter duplicate sales orders based on the unique ID.
AL
Alberta
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) Configure an Idempotent Message Validator component to filter each record by the order ID.