Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam MuleSoft Integration Architect I Topic 6 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MuleSoft Integration Architect I exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 6
[All MuleSoft Integration Architect I Questions]

A finance giant is planning to migrate all its Mule applications to Runtime fabric (RTF). Currently all Mule applications are deployed cloud hub using automated CI/CD scripts.

As an integration architect, which of the below step would you suggest to ensure that the applications from cloudhub are migrated properly to Runtime Fabric (RTF) with an assumption that organization is keen on keeping the same deployment strategy.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Tammara at Sep 09, 2024, 07:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MuleSoft Integration Architect I Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Victor
29 days ago
I hear you, Peggie. Migrating all those apps is going to be a real 'Mule'titude of work. But at least they're keeping the same deployment strategy - no need to 'fabric-ate' a whole new process.
upvoted 0 times
Claudia
10 days ago
C) runtimeFabric deployment should be added to POM.xml file in all the mule applications and CI/CD script should be modified as per the RTF configurations
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
14 days ago
B) runtimeFabric dependency should be added as a mule plug-in to POM.xml file and CI/CD script should be modified as per the RTF configurations
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
16 days ago
A) No changes need to be made to POM.xml file and CI/CD script should be modified as per the RTF configurations
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Peggie
1 months ago
I'm just glad I don't have to migrate all those Mule apps myself. That sounds like a real pain in the fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
1 months ago
Option C looks like overkill. Adding the runtimeFabric deployment to the POM.xml file in every Mule application seems unnecessary. I'd go with Option B.
upvoted 0 times
Lajuana
2 days ago
I also prefer Option B. It's a more practical approach to ensure a smooth migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
6 days ago
I think Option B is the best way to go. It's simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
10 days ago
I agree, Option C does seem like overkill. Option B seems like a more efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivette
2 months ago
I'm not sure why we would need to modify the POM.xml file at all. Isn't the whole point of RTF to provide a seamless migration from CloudHub? Option A sounds like the easiest approach.
upvoted 0 times
Odelia
1 months ago
I agree, keeping the same deployment strategy would be ideal. Modifying CI/CD scripts should be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 months ago
Option A sounds like the easiest approach. No need to make changes to POM.xml file.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emilio
2 months ago
Option B makes the most sense to me. Adding the runtimeFabric dependency as a Mule plugin in the POM file and modifying the CI/CD script to match RTF configurations seems like the appropriate way to migrate the applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
2 months ago
That's a valid point, Ashleigh. Option C does seem like a more thorough solution. It's important to ensure all applications are properly configured for the migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more appropriate. Adding runtimeFabric deployment to POM.xml in all applications will provide a more comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
2 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. Adding runtimeFabric dependency as a mule plug-in will ensure smooth migration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel