Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam MuleSoft Integration Architect I Topic 5 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MuleSoft Integration Architect I exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 5
[All MuleSoft Integration Architect I Questions]

A large life sciences customer plans to use the Mule Tracing module with the Mapped Diagnostic Context (MDC) logging operations to enrich logging in its Mule application and to improve tracking by providing more context in the Mule application logs. The customer also wants to improve throughput and lower the message processing latency in its Mule application flows.

After installing the Mule Tracing module in the Mule application, how should logging be performed in flows in Mule applications, and what should be changed In the log4j2.xml files?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Nan
2 months ago
Hmm, I don't know about that AsyncLogger business. Seems a bit overkill for a simple logging setup. But hey, what do I know? I'm just here for the free snacks.
upvoted 0 times
Dorian
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Let's keep it simple and add the Mule Tracing module Set logging variable operations before the Core Logger components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
1 months ago
User 1: I think we should go with option A. It seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devorah
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. I guess we need to carefully read the question and options before selecting the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B as it mentions using %MDC placeholder with AsyncLogger element.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
2 months ago
Hold up, did you say AsyncLogger? That's a bold move, Cotton. I hope it pays off for them.
upvoted 0 times
Gregg
1 months ago
B) Yeah, using AsyncLogger can definitely help with improving throughput and lowering message processing latency. It's a smart choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
1 months ago
A) In the flows, add Mule Tracing module Set logging variable operations before any Core Logger components. In log4j2.xml files, change the appender's pattern layout to use %MDC and then assign the appender to a Logger or Root element.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devorah
2 months ago
I think the answer is A because it mentions using %MDC in the pattern layout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
2 months ago
I agree with Ona. Using the Mule Tracing module and the %MDC placeholder in the log4j2.xml file is the way to go. Seems straightforward enough.
upvoted 0 times
Maryanne
1 months ago
B) Agreed, using the %MDC placeholder seems like the right approach for better tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
1 months ago
A) That makes sense, it's important to set the logging variables correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
2 months ago
B) In the flows, add Mule Tracing module Set logging variable operations before any Core Logger components. In log4j2.xmI files, change the appender's pattern layout to use the %MDC placeholder and then assign the appender to an AsyncLogger element.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
2 months ago
A) In the flows, add Mule Tracing module Set logging variable operations before any Core Logger components. In log4j2.xml files, change the appender's pattern layout to use %MDC and then assign the appender to a Logger or Root element.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ona
2 months ago
The correct answer is B. The Mule Tracing module should be used to set logging variables, and the log4j2.xml file should use the %MDC placeholder in the appender's pattern layout, which is then assigned to an AsyncLogger element.
upvoted 0 times
Therese
2 months ago
Yes, you're right. The Mule Tracing module should be used to set logging variables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel