Salesforce Exam MuleSoft Integration Architect I Topic 3 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MuleSoft Integration Architect I exam

Question #: 23
Topic #: 3

[All MuleSoft Integration Architect I Questions]

A Mule application is built to support a local transaction for a series of operations on a single database. The mule application has a Scatter-Gather scope that participates in the local transaction.

What is the behavior of the Scatter-Gather when running within this local transaction?

AExecution of all routes within Scatter-Gather occurs in parallel Any error that occurs inside Scatter-Gather will result in a roll back of all the database operations

BExecution of all routes within Scatter-Gather occurs sequentially Any error that occurs inside Scatter-Gather will be handled by error handler and will not result in roll back

CExecution of all routes within Scatter-Gather occurs sequentially Any error that occurs inside Scatter-Gather will result in a roll back of all the database operations

DExecution of all routes within Scatter-Gather occurs in parallel Any error that occurs inside Scatter-Gather will be handled by error handler and will not result in roll back

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Pansy at Jan 14, 2025, 09:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MuleSoft Integration Architect I Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Donette

2 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. If the Scatter-Gather is part of a local transaction, then the execution order doesn't really matter, right? The key is that any errors should be handled without affecting the entire transaction. I'm going with Option B.

upvoted 0 times

Becky

8 days ago

Yes, Option B ensures that any errors inside Scatter-Gather are handled properly without causing a roll back of all database operations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martina

12 days ago

I agree, handling errors without affecting the entire transaction is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delisa

1 months ago

I think you're right. Option B seems like the best choice in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacki

2 months ago

Haha, I bet the correct answer is gonna be the one that's the most confusing! Mule transactions are like a game of Tetris - you think you've got it all figured out, then BAM, everything comes crashing down.

upvoted 0 times

Ruby

1 months ago

D) Execution of all routes within Scatter-Gather occurs in parallel Any error that occurs inside Scatter-Gather will be handled by error handler and will not result in roll back

upvoted 0 times

...

Xuan

1 months ago

B) Execution of all routes within Scatter-Gather occurs sequentially Any error that occurs inside Scatter-Gather will be handled by error handler and will not result in roll back

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

2 months ago

A) Execution of all routes within Scatter-Gather occurs in parallel Any error that occurs inside Scatter-Gather will result in a roll back of all the database operations

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindy

2 months ago

I'm going with Option D. It just makes sense that if the routes are running in parallel, any errors should be handled individually without affecting the whole transaction. Why would Mule roll back everything if one route fails?

upvoted 0 times

Lezlie

2 months ago

I think Option D is the best choice too. It's important to handle errors in parallel routes without affecting the entire transaction.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emilio

2 months ago

I agree with you, Option D seems like the most logical choice. Handling errors individually makes more sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentin

2 months ago

Option C definitely seems the most logical. If the Scatter-Gather is part of a local transaction, any errors within it should result in a rollback of the entire database operation, regardless of whether the execution is sequential or parallel.

upvoted 0 times

...