Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce JS-Dev-101 Exam - Topic 4 Question 3 Discussion

Posted by Kristeen on Mar 08, 2026 at 04:31 PM

Given the code below:

let numValue = 1982;

Which three code segments result in a correct conversion from number to string?

Suggested Answer: B, C, D

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From JavaScript Knowledge:

We want to convert the number 1982 to a string.

Check each option:

A . numValue.toText()

There is no standard toText() method on numbers.

This will result in TypeError: numValue.toText is not a function.

B . String(numValue);

String() as a function converts its argument to a string.

String(1982) returns '1982'.

This is correct.

C . '' + numValue;

'' is a string; + with a string operand performs string concatenation.

'' + 1982 '1982'.

This is a common shorthand for number-to-string conversion.

D . numValue.toString();

Number.prototype.toString() converts the number to its string representation.

1982..toString() or (1982).toString() returns '1982'.

For the variable, numValue.toString() is valid: '1982'.

E . (String)numValue;

This is not valid JavaScript casting syntax; it is more like a C/Java-style cast.

In JavaScript, that is parsed as a grouping expression (String) and then numValue; it does not convert numValue to a string.

Thus the correct answers are:

B . String(numValue);

C . '' + numValue;

D . numValue.toString();

Relevant concepts: primitive type conversion, String() casting, .toString(), coercion via + with strings.

________________________________________


Get Premium JS-Dev-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
MA
Mattie 23 days ago
E looks like a syntax error. Only B, C, D work!
BR
Brittani 28 days ago
C is clever too. A is wrong for sure.
AN
Annita 1 month ago
Agreed! B and D are definitely right.
KA
Kate 1 month ago
I think B, C, and D are correct.
MA
Malcom 1 month ago
A and E are wrong. They won't convert properly.
SA
Sanjuana 2 months ago
C is clever too! Concatenation works.
KR
Krystina 2 months ago
Agreed! B and D are definitely right.
MA
Malinda 2 months ago
I think B, C, and D are correct.
LA
Lashandra 2 months ago
A and E won't work. They confuse me.
JE
Jesus 2 months ago
C is clever! Just concatenate.
CH
Chara 2 months ago
Agreed! B and D are definitely right.
LE
Leota 3 months ago
I think B, C, and D are correct.
LE
Leota 3 months ago
I thought A was valid at first, but nope!
RO
Rosalyn 3 months ago
Wait, how does C even work? Seems weird.
AN
Annmarie 3 months ago
Totally agree with B and D!
CY
Cyndy 3 months ago
A and E won't work, just a heads up.
ED
Edna 4 months ago
B, C, and D are correct!
JA
Jame 4 months ago
Definitely agree with B and D, solid methods!
TR
Trinidad 4 months ago
Wait, can you really convert like that? Sounds weird.
NO
Nohemi 5 months ago
I thought A might be valid, but guess not!
JO
Josphine 6 months ago
A and E won't work, just a heads up.
TH
Thad 6 months ago
B, C, and D are correct!
JE
Jesusita 6 months ago
D is the most common way to do it!
AM
Amalia 6 months ago
Wait, can you really convert like that?
GA
Gail 6 months ago
I thought A might work, but guess not!
DA
Danilo 6 months ago
A and E are definitely wrong.
SI
Simona 7 months ago
B, C, and D are correct!
JO
Johnna 7 months ago
I'm a bit confused about option A; I don't think `toText()` is a real method, but I can't recall all the details.
MO
Mose 7 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like `'' + numValue` is a common trick for conversion.
TH
Theodora 7 months ago
I think `numValue.toString()` is definitely a valid way to convert a number to a string.
JA
Jaclyn 7 months ago
I remember that using `String(numValue)` should work, but I'm not sure about the others.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel