Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Data-Con-101 Exam - Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion

A bank collects customer data for its loan applicants and high net worth customers. A customer can be both a load applicant and a high net worth customer, resulting in duplicate data.How should a consultant ingest and map this data in Data Cloud?
B) Ingest the data into two DLOs and map each to the individual and Contact point Email DMOs.
A) Use a data transform to consolidate the data into one DLO and them map it to the individual and Contact Point Email DMOs.
C) Ingest the data into two DLOs and then map to two custom DMOs.
D) Ingest the data into one DLO and then map to one custom DMO.

Salesforce Data-Con-101 Exam - Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Data-Con-101 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 4
[All Data-Con-101 Questions]

A bank collects customer data for its loan applicants and high net worth customers. A customer can be both a load applicant and a high net worth customer, resulting in duplicate data.

How should a consultant ingest and map this data in Data Cloud?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To handle duplicate data for customers who are both loan applicants and high net worth individuals, the consultant should ingest the data into two separate Data Lake Objects (DLOs) and map them to the Individual and Contact Point Email Data Model Objects (DMOs). Here's why and how this works:

Understanding the Problem :

Customers may exist in both datasets (loan applicants and high net worth individuals), leading to potential duplication.

To avoid redundancy while maintaining data integrity, the data must be ingested and mapped carefully.

Why Two DLOs?

By ingesting the data into two DLOs, you can maintain separation between the two datasets while still leveraging shared attributes (e.g., email addresses).

Mapping both DLOs to the Individual and Contact Point Email DMOs ensures that identity resolution can consolidate duplicate records based on shared identifiers like email.

Steps to Implement This Solution :

Step 1: Create two DLOs---one for loan applicants and another for high net worth customers.

Step 2: Map both DLOs to the Individual DMO to consolidate customer profiles.

Step 3: Map the email fields from both DLOs to the Contact Point Email DMO to enable identity resolution based on email addresses.

Step 4: Configure identity resolution rules to merge duplicate records based on shared attributes like email.

Why Not Other Options?

A . Use a data transform to consolidate the data into one DLO: Consolidating into a single DLO before mapping would lose the distinction between the two datasets and make it harder to manage updates or changes.

C . Ingest the data into two DLOs and then map to two custom DMOs: Creating custom DMOs is unnecessary complexity when the standard Individual and Contact Point Email DMOs can handle this scenario.

D . Ingest the data into one DLO and then map to one custom DMO: Using a single DLO would result in data loss or confusion, as the distinction between loan applicants and high net worth customers would be lost.

By using two DLOs and mapping them to the standard DMOs, the consultant ensures clean data ingestion and effective identity resolution.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Kenny
3 days ago
B seems safer for data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
8 days ago
I prefer B. More clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
13 days ago
It avoids duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
18 days ago
Why A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
23 days ago
I think option A is the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
29 days ago
I think C could work too, depending on the use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
1 month ago
Consolidating data helps streamline processes, so A is solid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
1 month ago
Surprised that D is even an option, that sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
1 month ago
I disagree, B might be better for clarity in data management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
2 months ago
Option A seems like the best approach to avoid duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daisy
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C because it allows for more flexibility with the custom DMOs, but I’m not confident if that’s the best approach for duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
2 months ago
I feel like option D could simplify things, but I’m worried about losing important details by merging everything into one DLO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
2 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to decide between using one or two DLOs, and I think it was better to keep them separate to avoid confusion. So maybe option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
2 months ago
I think option A makes sense since it talks about consolidating the data, but I'm not entirely sure how the data transform works in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel