Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce CRT-250 Exam - Topic 5 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-250 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 5
[All CRT-250 Questions]

Northern Trail Outfitters wants to add new data extensions containing customer purchases to their Marketing Cloud account

Which value should link these new data extensions in Data Designer to the existing contact records?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Gail at Jul 24, 2022, 01:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRT-250 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tien
5 months ago
I didn’t know Unique Contact Identifier was a thing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
6 months ago
Wait, D? Isn’t that too specific?
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
6 months ago
C could work, but it’s not as reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
6 months ago
I think B makes more sense, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
6 months ago
A is the best choice for linking data extensions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
6 months ago
Unique Contact email address seems too specific; I think it should be something more general like a unique identifier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
6 months ago
I feel like the Subscriber ID could work too, but I’m not confident if it’s the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
6 months ago
I remember something about primary keys being crucial for linking data, so maybe that’s the answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
7 months ago
I think the Unique Contact Identifier might be the right choice since it’s meant to link records, but I’m not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the question. Increasing the dropout rate in PREDICT mode seems like it could work, but I'm not sure how that would impact model performance. Maybe I should double-check the details on that approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
7 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. I thought the I-SID was used for interoperability purposes, not to determine the I-VPLS. And I'm not sure about the default settings either. I'll have to review my notes and try to eliminate the options that don't sound right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. Shouldn't we be adding data connectors to get the rule working? That's what I was thinking.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel