Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce CRT-250 Exam - Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

Posted by Leigha on Dec 09, 2024 at 06:38 AM

A Marketing Cloud admin at a bank is asked to avoid storing sensitive data in the

cloud. This data will only be sent to Marketing cloud to execute a send.

Which feature would the admin use to meet this requirement?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium CRT-250 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
NA
Natalie 11 months ago
Distributed Marketing Sends? That doesn't sound right at all.
LA
Latanya 11 months ago
Field Level Encryption could also work, but not as efficient.
CH
Charolette 12 months ago
Wait, can we really trust tokenization completely?
NA
Nakita 12 months ago
I agree, it's the best way to keep data safe.
SI
Sina 1 year ago
Definitely Tokenized Sending for this!
JU
Jutta 1 year ago
Distributed Marketing Sends sounds familiar, but I don't think it specifically deals with sensitive data storage. I might lean towards tokenized sending based on what I recall.
SC
Scarlet 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question about data handling, and I think list sending doesn't really address the sensitive data issue. It just uses existing lists, right?
DE
Devon 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like field level encryption could also be relevant here. It seems like it protects data, but I'm not clear if it applies to sending.
KA
Kaitlyn 1 year ago
I remember studying about data security in Marketing Cloud, and I think tokenized sending might be the right choice since it helps avoid storing sensitive data directly.
KA
Karan 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is Field Level Encryption another option that could work? I'll need to review the differences between the features to decide which one is best for this scenario.
FL
Florinda 1 year ago
Tokenized Sending sounds like the right approach here. It lets you send the data to Marketing Cloud without actually storing it there, which is exactly what the question is asking for.
GA
Galen 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I know we need to avoid storing sensitive data in the cloud, but I'm not familiar with all the different features in Marketing Cloud. I'll have to think this through carefully.
TI
Timothy 1 year ago
I think the answer is Tokenized Sending. That feature allows you to send data to Marketing Cloud without storing the sensitive information there.
AS
Ashlee 2 years ago
Hey, you know what they say - if you can't take the heat, get out of the cloud! Field Level Encryption is the way to go, folks.
JI
Jill 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ashlee
Tokenized Sending could also be a good choice to ensure data security during sends.
EL
Elliott 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ashlee
I agree, it's important to protect that information, especially in a bank setting.
TA
Tasia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ashlee
Field Level Encryption is definitely the best option for keeping sensitive data safe.
NA
Naomi 2 years ago
That's true, Tokenized Sending could also be a valid choice for this requirement.
LI
Lizbeth 2 years ago
But wouldn't Tokenized Sending also be a good option to avoid storing sensitive data?
LA
Lakeesha 2 years ago
I agree with Naomi, Field Level Encryption would keep the sensitive data secure.
NA
Naomi 2 years ago
I think the admin should use Field Level Encryption.
ST
Stephaine 2 years ago
Distributed Marketing Sends? More like 'Distributed my brain cells', am I right? Field Level Encryption is the clear winner here.
ME
Merlyn 2 years ago
List Sending? Psh, that's so 2010. Field Level Encryption is where it's at, my friend. Hacker-proof, I tell ya!
LE
Leota 2 years ago
↳ replying to Merlyn
I agree, List Sending is outdated. Field Level Encryption provides an extra layer of security.
AL
Alesia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Merlyn
Field Level Encryption is definitely the way to go. Can't be too careful with sensitive data.
BR
Brett 2 years ago
Tokenized Sending sounds pretty fancy, but I don't think it's the right fit here. Gotta keep that sensitive data under lock and key!
CO
Coral 2 years ago
Ooh, this is a tricky one! I'd say Field Level Encryption is the way to go. Keeps the data secure without any funny business.
ED
Edelmira 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
List Sending wouldn't be the best choice for this situation.
GA
Gaynell 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
Distributed Marketing Sends is not the right feature to use for this requirement.
ST
Stephaine 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
I've used Field Level Encryption before, it's a reliable choice for keeping data safe.
AR
Arthur 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
Tokenized Sending could also work, but I agree that Field Level Encryption is more secure.
CH
Chau 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
Yeah, that would definitely keep the sensitive data secure.
BR
Brendan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
Tokenized Sending could also work, but I think Field Level Encryption is more secure.
PO
Polly 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
I think Field Level Encryption is the best option here.
FE
Felicitas 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
I agree, Field Level Encryption is the best option for keeping sensitive data secure.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel