Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified CRM Analytics and Einstein Discovery Consultant (Analytics-Con-201) Exam - Topic 1 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified CRM Analytics and Einstein Discovery Consultant (Analytics-Con-201) exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Certified CRM Analytics and Einstein Discovery Consultant (Analytics-Con-201) Questions]

A team of CRM Analytics developers has been working on an existing recipe to add new derived fields. The edited version has been failing ever since, and management is requesting that the dashboard show refreshed data while they work on the edits.

How can the developers add new fields while keeping the dataset refreshed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Leonard at Mar 18, 2025, 03:55 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified CRM Analytics and Einstein Discovery Consultant (Analytics-Con-201) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Malinda
4 months ago
I think they should definitely try Option A first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
4 months ago
I disagree, refreshing after hours (Option C) won't solve the underlying issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
5 months ago
Wait, can they really just roll back like that? Sounds too easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
5 months ago
A new recipe as a join node (Option A) could work too, but it sounds complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
5 months ago
Option B seems like the safest bet. Roll back and work on a clone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manage edits without downtime. I think the join node option could work, but I'm not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
5 months ago
I feel like refreshing the dataset after hours might just be a temporary fix. We need a more permanent solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
6 months ago
Cloning the existing recipe sounds familiar; I think it could help avoid issues with the original version failing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
6 months ago
I remember something about using a join node, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. Option A sounds like the way to go. Create a separate recipe for the new fields, test it out, and then add it in as a join. That way we can keep the core recipe working while we iterate on the new stuff. Shouldn't be too much extra work, and it's the safest approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure any of these options are perfect. I think I'd want to dig into the details a bit more to understand exactly what's going on with the failing edited version. Maybe we could try option A, but also see if we can figure out what's causing the issues with the edited recipe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Should we really be cloning the entire recipe just to add some new fields? That seems like a lot of extra work. I'm leaning more towards option C - just refreshing the dataset after hours to avoid the failing edited version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
7 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'm thinking option A might be the best approach - create a separate recipe for the new fields and then add it as a join node to the existing recipe. That way we can keep the existing recipe working while we test out the new fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
11 months ago
Option A sounds like a good compromise. Add the new fields in a separate recipe and then integrate it into the existing one. That way, the dashboard can stay refreshed while the changes are being made.
upvoted 0 times
Sharee
10 months ago
I agree. It's crucial to have a smooth transition when adding new fields to avoid any disruptions in the dataset refreshment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
10 months ago
That's a good point. It's important to ensure that the dashboard continues to show updated data even during the development process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
11 months ago
Option A sounds like a good compromise. Add the new fields in a separate recipe and then integrate it into the existing one. That way, the dashboard can stay refreshed while the changes are being made.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
11 months ago
I agree. It's crucial to have a smooth transition when adding new fields to avoid disruptions in the dataset refresh process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
11 months ago
That's a good point. It's important to ensure that the dashboard continues to show updated data even during the development process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
11 months ago
Option A sounds like a good compromise. Add the new fields in a separate recipe and then integrate it into the existing one. That way, the dashboard can stay refreshed while the changes are being made.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilda
12 months ago
Ha! I bet the developers are wishing they had a 'refresh' button for themselves right about now. Option B sounds like the best way to keep the dashboard running while they figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
Edward
10 months ago
I agree, it's important to keep the dashboard running while they work on the edits. Cloning the recipe seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
11 months ago
Yeah, rolling back to the last working version is a smart move. It will prevent any further issues with the edited version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
11 months ago
Option B sounds like a good plan. They can clone the existing recipe to add fields and keep the dashboard running smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracia
1 year ago
I'm not sure I agree with Option C. Refreshing the dataset after working hours doesn't really solve the problem, it just delays it. The new fields need to be added in a way that doesn't cause the whole recipe to fail.
upvoted 0 times
Ciara
11 months ago
A) A recipe for the new fields and when that is successful, add it to the existing recipe as a join node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
11 months ago
I'm not sure about rolling back the original recipe, that could cause data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
11 months ago
B) Clone the existing recipe to add fields and roll back the original recipe to the last working version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
11 months ago
A) A recipe for the new fields and when that is successful, add it to the existing recipe as a join node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
12 months ago
I agree, adding the new fields separately and then integrating them into the existing recipe seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
12 months ago
A) A recipe for the new fields and when that is successful, add it to the existing recipe as a join node.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Walton
1 year ago
Option B seems the most logical approach. Cloning the existing recipe and rolling back the original will ensure the dashboard stays refreshed while the new fields are being added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
1 year ago
I see both points, but I think option C could also work. Refreshing the dataset after working hours can minimize disruptions during the editing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more practical. Cloning the existing recipe ensures that the original version can be easily restored if the edits fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice. It allows for testing the new fields separately before adding them to the existing recipe.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel