Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce CCM-101 Exam - Topic 8 Question 4 Discussion

Which method is efficient and scalable because it uses the product search index rather than searching the database?
C) ProductSearcbHodel().gerProductSearchHita()
A) ProducrlndexModel.getOrderableProductsOnly()
B) ProduccAvailabiliryModel.isOrderable()
D) ProductVanari.cnMcciel.aerVariams ()

Salesforce CCM-101 Exam - Topic 8 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CCM-101 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 8
[All CCM-101 Questions]

Which method is efficient and scalable because it uses the product search index rather than searching the database?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Merissa at May 05, 2022, 07:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCM-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Malcom
9 months ago
Totally agree with C, it’s scalable for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure C is the best option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliseo
9 months ago
B is not efficient at all, it just checks availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
9 months ago
I think A is better for orderable products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
9 months ago
Definitely C, it uses the search index!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
9 months ago
I don't recall the exact details, but I feel like D was about variants, not really related to the search index.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused between A and C. I thought both might relate to product searching, but C seems more focused on the index.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
9 months ago
I think the method that uses the product search index is probably C, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
10 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I feel like the search index is definitely more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
10 months ago
Hmm, the information about the promoter's background is a bit concerning. I'll need to carefully consider that along with the financial data to make a well-rounded assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The underlined text is talking about the TTL value, which is the length of time that other DNS servers use to determine how long to cache the information. So I'll go with option D, "No change is needed".
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel