Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce CCM-101 Exam - Topic 4 Question 41 Discussion

A developer has these requirements for out-of-stock products:Save the SKUs of the out-of-stock products that the customer is interested inSave the customer email regardless if the customer is a guest or registeredEmail the customer when the product is back-in-stockWhich step should the developer perform as part of the solution to achieve the requirements?
C) Create a new custom object type that has a set-of-string type custom attribute for the SKUs and a string for the email field.
A) Create a new set-of-string type custom attribute to the system object type Profile to save all the SKUs and use the existing email field for the email.
B) Create a new system object type that has a set-of-string type custom attribute for the SKUs and a string for the email field.
D) Create a new set-of-string type custom attribute to the system object type Product to save all the customer email addresses for back-in-stock notification.

Salesforce CCM-101 Exam - Topic 4 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CCM-101 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 4
[All CCM-101 Questions]

A developer has these requirements for out-of-stock products:

Save the SKUs of the out-of-stock products that the customer is interested in

Save the customer email regardless if the customer is a guest or registered

Email the customer when the product is back-in-stock

Which step should the developer perform as part of the solution to achieve the requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Chan at May 17, 2024, 07:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCM-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tayna
8 months ago
Totally agree with B, it’s the cleanest solution for this scenario!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
8 months ago
Wait, why not just use the Product object for emails? D sounds weird.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
8 months ago
C makes sense too, but isn't it overkill for just SKUs and emails?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
9 months ago
I think B is better, a new system object keeps things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
9 months ago
Option A seems the simplest, just using existing fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
9 months ago
I feel like option D is off because it suggests saving emails in the Product object, which doesn't seem right based on the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether we should use a custom attribute or a new object type. I feel like option B might be too complex for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
9 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to create a new object type for storing additional data, which makes me lean towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shoshana
10 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar since we talked about using existing fields for efficiency, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonie
10 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand it fully. I'll carefully read through the options and think about the implications of each approach before selecting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Creating a new custom object type with the necessary fields seems like the most logical solution to meet all the requirements. I'll make sure to double-check my work before submitting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure which option is the best here. I'll need to review the requirements again and consider the pros and cons of each approach before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the requirements. Do we need to save the SKUs and emails separately, or can we store them together in one object? I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
10 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I think the best approach would be to create a new custom object type to store the SKUs and customer emails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
10 months ago
This one seems straightforward. I'm pretty sure the answer is Configuration Auditing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
10 months ago
Business capability analysis could also be useful to assess if the new solution is actually meeting the required business capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
10 months ago
Okay, the key here is understanding the path of the protected LSP and the potential points of failure. I'll analyze each option closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
1 year ago
Option B is the way to go. Keeping everything in one place, nice and tidy. Just like my desk - wait, no, bad example.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
1 year ago
Ha! Option A is like trying to cram a square peg into a round hole. Using the Profile object for this? Nah, that's not going to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
1 year ago
Hmm, Option D is an interesting approach, but I'm not sure I like the idea of storing customer emails on the Product object. Seems like it could get messy.
upvoted 0 times
Levi
1 year ago
Yeah, Option D might cause issues with data management. Option A seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
1 year ago
I agree, Option A keeps the data organized and separate. It's a cleaner solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
1 year ago
I think Option A is a better choice. It saves the SKUs in the Profile object and uses the existing email field.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nakita
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Creating a custom object type specifically for this use case makes the most sense to me, and it keeps the data separate from other system objects.
upvoted 0 times
Scarlet
1 year ago
Definitely, Option C seems like the most logical choice for saving the SKUs and customer email for out-of-stock products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
1 year ago
I agree, having a custom object type dedicated to this use case seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
1 year ago
Option C sounds like the best choice. It keeps the data organized and separate from other system objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Richelle
1 year ago
Why do you think option C is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
James
1 year ago
Option B looks the most straightforward way to handle the requirements. Creating a new system object type with the necessary attributes seems like the cleanest solution.
upvoted 0 times
Goldie
1 year ago
Creating a new system object type with the necessary attributes seems like the cleanest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
1 year ago
Option B looks the most straightforward way to handle the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
1 year ago
I think the developer should choose option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel