Discuss Salesforce CCM-101 Exam Topic 4 Question 41

A developer has these requirements for out-of-stock products:

Save the SKUs of the out-of-stock products that the customer is interested in

Save the customer email regardless if the customer is a guest or registered

Email the customer when the product is back-in-stock

Which step should the developer perform as part of the solution to achieve the requirements?

ACreate a new set-of-string type custom attribute to the system object type Profile to save all the SKUs and use the existing email field for the email.

BCreate a new system object type that has a set-of-string type custom attribute for the SKUs and a string for the email field.

CCreate a new custom object type that has a set-of-string type custom attribute for the SKUs and a string for the email field.

DCreate a new set-of-string type custom attribute to the system object type Product to save all the customer email addresses for back-in-stock notification.

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium CCM-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

33 comments · newest first

Tayna 11 months ago

Totally agree with B, it’s the cleanest solution for this scenario!

Gary 11 months ago

Wait, why not just use the Product object for emails? D sounds weird.

Tawny 11 months ago

C makes sense too, but isn't it overkill for just SKUs and emails?

Lemuel 11 months ago

I think B is better, a new system object keeps things organized.

Terry 12 months ago

Option A seems the simplest, just using existing fields.

Margart 12 months ago

I feel like option D is off because it suggests saving emails in the Product object, which doesn't seem right based on the requirements.

Jacob 1 year ago

I'm a bit confused about whether we should use a custom attribute or a new object type. I feel like option B might be too complex for this scenario.

Larae 1 year ago

I remember a practice question where we had to create a new object type for storing additional data, which makes me lean towards option C.

Shoshana 1 year ago

I think option A sounds familiar since we talked about using existing fields for efficiency, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best choice here.

Leonie 1 year ago

This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand it fully. I'll carefully read through the options and think about the implications of each approach before selecting my answer.

Starr 1 year ago

Okay, I think I've got it. Creating a new custom object type with the necessary fields seems like the most logical solution to meet all the requirements. I'll make sure to double-check my work before submitting.

Beata 1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not sure which option is the best here. I'll need to review the requirements again and consider the pros and cons of each approach before making a decision.

Caprice 1 year ago

I'm a bit confused by the requirements. Do we need to save the SKUs and emails separately, or can we store them together in one object? I'll need to think this through carefully.

Arthur 1 year ago

This seems like a straightforward question. I think the best approach would be to create a new custom object type to store the SKUs and customer emails.

Dorothy 1 year ago

This one seems straightforward. I'm pretty sure the answer is Configuration Auditing.

Kent 1 year ago

Business capability analysis could also be useful to assess if the new solution is actually meeting the required business capabilities.

Holley 1 year ago

Okay, the key here is understanding the path of the protected LSP and the potential points of failure. I'll analyze each option closely.

Cordelia 1 year ago

Option B is the way to go. Keeping everything in one place, nice and tidy. Just like my desk - wait, no, bad example.

Eleonore 1 year ago

Ha! Option A is like trying to cram a square peg into a round hole. Using the Profile object for this? Nah, that's not going to work.

Benedict 1 year ago

Hmm, Option D is an interesting approach, but I'm not sure I like the idea of storing customer emails on the Product object. Seems like it could get messy.

Levi 1 year ago

↳ replying to Benedict

Yeah, Option D might cause issues with data management. Option A seems like the way to go.

Toi 1 year ago

↳ replying to Benedict

I agree, Option A keeps the data organized and separate. It's a cleaner solution.

Gracie 1 year ago

↳ replying to Benedict

I think Option A is a better choice. It saves the SKUs in the Profile object and uses the existing email field.

Nakita 1 year ago

I'm leaning towards Option C. Creating a custom object type specifically for this use case makes the most sense to me, and it keeps the data separate from other system objects.

Scarlet 1 year ago

↳ replying to Nakita

Definitely, Option C seems like the most logical choice for saving the SKUs and customer email for out-of-stock products.

Haydee 1 year ago

↳ replying to Nakita

I agree, having a custom object type dedicated to this use case seems like the most efficient solution.

Mitzie 1 year ago

↳ replying to Nakita

Option C sounds like the best choice. It keeps the data organized and separate from other system objects.

Richelle 2 years ago

Why do you think option C is better?

James 2 years ago

Option B looks the most straightforward way to handle the requirements. Creating a new system object type with the necessary attributes seems like the cleanest solution.

Goldie 1 year ago

↳ replying to James

Creating a new system object type with the necessary attributes seems like the cleanest solution.

Nan 1 year ago

↳ replying to James

Option B looks the most straightforward way to handle the requirements.

Quentin 2 years ago

I disagree, I believe option C is the best choice.

Richelle 2 years ago

I think the developer should choose option B.

Salesforce CCM-101 Exam - Topic 4 Question 41 Discussion