Salesforce CCM-101 Exam - Topic 2 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CCM-101 exam

Question #: 58
Topic #: 2

Which three techniques improve client-side performance in production while following documented best practices? (Choose three.)

AUse one style sheet for each ISML decorator template.

BPlace CSS outside of templates.

CCompress CSS.

DUse inline Javascript.

ECombine several images into a single image.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Jacquelyne at Jan 11, 2025, 08:16 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCM-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Cary

8 months ago

Wait, using one style sheet per template? That sounds counterproductive!

upvoted 0 times

...

Shoshana

8 months ago

Placing CSS outside of templates is a solid move.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

8 months ago

Combining images is a must for performance!

upvoted 0 times

...

Delila

9 months ago

I think using inline JavaScript can slow things down, not speed them up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audra

9 months ago

Definitely compress CSS! It makes a huge difference.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gwen

9 months ago

Using inline JavaScript? I feel like that might actually slow things down instead of improving performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaclyn

9 months ago

Combining images into a single image sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it was specifically for client-side performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luann

9 months ago

I remember practicing a question about placing CSS outside of templates; that seems like a good option for performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jovita

9 months ago

I think compressing CSS is definitely one of the techniques, but I'm not sure about the others.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

9 months ago

I think I know the answer to this one. Compressing CSS, combining images, and placing CSS outside of templates should do the trick.

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

9 months ago

Placing CSS outside of templates and using inline JavaScript? I'm not sure those are best practices, but I'll double-check.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

9 months ago

Okay, I've got some ideas. Compressing CSS and combining images seem like good options to improve performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dyan

9 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to review the documentation to make sure I understand the right techniques.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edward

10 months ago

This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the best practices for client-side performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulene

1 year ago

Wait, did someone say 'inline JavaScript'? Is this a trick question or something? That's like putting ketchup on your ice cream - it just doesn't belong!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lajuana

1 year ago

Compressing CSS, combining images, and placing CSS outside of templates? Sign me up! But I'm not going to touch that inline JavaScript with a ten-foot pole.

upvoted 0 times

Vivienne

1 year ago

E) Combine several images into a single image.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

1 year ago

C) Compress CSS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

1 year ago

A) Use one style sheet for each ISML decorator template.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rupert

1 year ago

Hmm, using inline JavaScript? That's like wearing socks with sandals - it just doesn't look right. I'll stick with the best practices here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marjory

1 year ago

Combining images into a single image is a smart move, and compressing CSS is a must-do. But one style sheet per ISML decorator template? That's overkill.

upvoted 0 times

Vanesa

1 year ago

E) Combine several images into a single image.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashonda

1 year ago

C) Compress CSS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaycee

1 year ago

A) Use one style sheet for each ISML decorator template.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dwight

1 year ago

Placing CSS outside of templates and compressing CSS sounds like a good idea to improve client-side performance. But using inline JavaScript? That's a big no-no for me.

upvoted 0 times