Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Architect (Arch-303) Exam - Topic 5 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Architect (Arch-303) exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 5
[All Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Architect (Arch-303) Questions]

A client receives multiple feeds from third parties on the same SFTP location:

* Product prices (sftp: prod/prices)

* Stores information (sftp: prod/stores;

* Product information (sftp: prod/catalog)

* Categories information (sftp: prod/marketing)

* Content (sftp: prod/marketing)

Some of the feeds are placed on sftp multiple times a day, as the information is updated in the source system.

The Architect decides to have only two jobs:

* One that checks and downloads available feeds every hour

* One that imports the files from Webdav once a day before the data replication, using the standards steps available in the Job Framework

Which design is correctfor the import Job, taking the steps scope in consideration?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

This design maximizes efficiency and concurrency. By having the jobs that import products, stores, prices, and content run in parallel, the system can handle multiple data streams simultaneously, reducing total processing time. The sequential execution of importing categories followed by reindexing ensures that all new and updated information is properly indexed and available for site use, following the completion of the import of more frequently updated data. This order respects dependencies between steps and aligns with best practices for handling complex data workflows in B2C Commerce environments.


by Jonell at Apr 30, 2025, 07:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Architect (Arch-303) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gracia
4 months ago
Not sure if one job a day is enough for all those updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
4 months ago
Wait, why are we importing content after categories? That feels off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
4 months ago
I think D makes more sense for the reindexing step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
5 months ago
Seems like option B is the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
5 months ago
I agree with D, parallel processing should speed things up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
5 months ago
I lean towards option D since it mentions importing categories last, which aligns with the idea of ensuring all other data is in place first before reindexing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we should import content before or after categories. I feel like we practiced something similar, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
5 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar because it has the last flow importing categories and then reindexing, which seems logical based on similar practice questions we did.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
6 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of parallel processing for efficiency, but I'm not sure if all feeds should run in parallel or if some should be sequenced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
6 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think I have a good strategy. I'll focus on maximizing parallelism where I can, while also ensuring the proper sequencing of the steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
6 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The question is clear on the requirements, and I can see a straightforward solution that meets the criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to execute the import steps in parallel where possible, and then handle the categories and reindexing in a separate sequential flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different feed locations and the requirement to have only two jobs. I'll need to think through the dependencies between the different data sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
7 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and the order of the steps to determine the best design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
10 months ago
Option D gets my vote. Keeping the categories separate makes sense, and the reindex at the end is a smart move to ensure everything is synced up properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
10 months ago
Haha, I bet the architect who came up with this design was having a bad day and just wanted to get it done quickly. Option C looks like a real mess!
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
10 months ago
I personally think option C is the correct design because it imports steps in parallel and then executes the remaining steps in sequence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
10 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense. But I still think option A is better because it separates the steps clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
10 months ago
I agree with Mammie. Option B is the way to go. The parallel flows for the core data import, followed by a sequential flow for categories and reindex, is a clean and efficient design.
upvoted 0 times
Lai
9 months ago
Option B it is then!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
9 months ago
It's definitely a clean and efficient design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
9 months ago
I agree, having parallel flows for core data and then sequential for categories makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
9 months ago
Definitely, keeping things organized with parallel flows for core data and sequential for categories is a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
10 months ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
10 months ago
I agree, having the categories and reindex steps in a sequential flow makes sense for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
10 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. It keeps the core data import flows running in parallel.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mila
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the correct design because it executes steps in parallel and then in sequence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
11 months ago
Option B looks good to me. Handling the categories separately in a sequential flow seems like a sensible approach, especially if it's a more complex operation.
upvoted 0 times
Clorinda
10 months ago
Yes, Option B seems to be the best choice for the import job, keeping the categories import separate can prevent any potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
10 months ago
I think Option B is the most efficient design for the import job, it separates the categories import for better control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
11 months ago
I agree, having the categories import and reindex steps in a sequential flow can help ensure data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
11 months ago
Option B looks good to me. Handling the categories separately in a sequential flow seems like a sensible approach, especially if it's a more complex operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elena
12 months ago
I think the correct design for the import job is option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
12 months ago
The four parallel flows for the key data entities make sense, but I'm not sure about the last sequential flow handling categories and reindex. Shouldn't categories be part of the parallel flows as well?
upvoted 0 times
Denny
11 months ago
The last flow handling categories and reindex sequentially might be necessary for data consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
11 months ago
B) - foursibling flows execute steps in parallel: import products, stores, prices, content- last flow executes steps in sequence import categories, reindex
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
11 months ago
A) - four sibling flows execute steps in parallel: import products, stores, prices, content- fifth flow executes: import categories- last flow executes steps in sequence: reindex
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel