Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Architect (Arch-303) Exam - Topic 3 Question 58 Discussion

The Client wants to offer custom made container products on its new B2C Commerce storefront. TheClient provided two business requirements.* Customer can specify container length, width, and height.* Customer can specify the material that the container is made of.The Client also provided the Architect a current data schema (shown below) for reference while preparing the technical documentation.Which two gaps between the requirements and the data schema should the Architect discuss with the Client?Choose 2 answers
A) The data schema includes unique identifiers for material and color fields,but neither are reflected in the business requirements. and B) The data schema includes an implied structure that the customer's choices should be captured as custom objects, but there isn't a business requirement to do so
C) The data schema includes a material Price_Markup field, but there Isn't a business requirement to factor the material cost Into the final price calculation.
D) The data schema includes a Color_ID field, but there isn't a business requirement to allow the customer to specify container color.

Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Architect (Arch-303) Exam - Topic 3 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Architect (Arch-303) exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Architect (Arch-303) Questions]

The Client wants to offer custom made container products on its new B2C Commerce storefront. TheClient provided two business requirements.

* Customer can specify container length, width, and height.

* Customer can specify the material that the container is made of.

The Client also provided the Architect a current data schema (shown below) for reference while preparing the technical documentation.

Which two gaps between the requirements and the data schema should the Architect discuss with the Client?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

The risks associated with the proposed real-time inventory update solution during flash sales are:

Option A (The default rate limiter configuration for the web-service could cause the web-service to return an exception during high traffic): This is a critical risk because high traffic during flash sales could exceed the rate limits set for the web-service, leading to exceptions and potentially failing to update inventory in real-time.

Option B (If the external hosted web-service is unreliable, it could be a point of failure in the site's order placement flow): Reliance on an external web-service for crucial operations like inventory updates introduces a risk of downtime or performance issues if the service is unreliable, directly impacting the ability to complete orders during peak sales periods.

Both risks could severely disrupt operations during critical sales events, suggesting a need for robust contingency plans and potentially reevaluating the solution architecture to ensure reliability.


by Toshia at Jan 26, 2025, 06:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Architect (Arch-303) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Katlyn
9 months ago
C is interesting, but do we really need to factor in material costs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
10 months ago
B is definitely a gap too, custom objects are crucial here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kina
10 months ago
Wait, why isn’t color mentioned in the requirements? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
10 months ago
Totally agree with A, that's a big oversight!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
10 months ago
A and C seem like clear gaps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
10 months ago
I’m a bit confused about option D. If color isn’t mentioned in the requirements, does that mean it’s not necessary to include it in the schema?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
11 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this where we had to identify missing elements in a schema. I think option C could be relevant since pricing is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
11 months ago
I think option A makes sense since the material and color fields are mentioned in the schema but not in the requirements. That seems like a gap we should address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
11 months ago
I remember discussing how important it is to align the data schema with the business requirements, but I'm not sure if we covered the specifics about custom objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
11 months ago
The implied structure for custom objects is an interesting point. I'll need to understand if the client wants that level of flexibility or if a simpler approach would suffice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
11 months ago
I think the key gaps here are the material and price markup fields. The requirements don't mention anything about those, so I'll need to discuss with the client how they want to handle those aspects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. The requirements mention container length, width, and height, as well as material, but the data schema has some additional fields like color and price markup that aren't covered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the requirements and data schema to identify any gaps or misalignments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
1 year ago
I bet the client's idea of 'custom' is just choosing between 'small', 'medium', and 'large'.
upvoted 0 times
Lisha
1 year ago
B) The data schema includes an implied structure that the customer's choices should be captured as custom objects, but there isn't a business requirement to do so
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
1 year ago
A) The data schema includes unique identifiers for material and color fields, but neither are reflected in the business requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salley
1 year ago
Wait, the client wants custom containers but didn't mention anything about custom designs? Looks like someone's not thinking outside the box.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
1 year ago
A material price markup, eh? I hope the client isn't trying to pull a fast one on the customers. Better double-check that with them.
upvoted 0 times
Elizabeth
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharita
1 year ago
Hmm, the color field is interesting. Maybe the client wants to offer it as a future option, but forgot to mention it in the current requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Verona
1 year ago
B) The data schema includes an implied structure that the customer's choices should be captured as custom objects, but there isn't a business requirement to do so
upvoted 0 times
...
James
1 year ago
Maybe the client is planning to add color options later on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
1 year ago
D) The data schema includes a Color_ID field, but there isn't a business requirement to allow the customer to specify container color.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
1 year ago
A) The data schema includes unique identifiers for material and color fields, but neither are reflected in the business requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deonna
1 year ago
The data schema seems to have more fields than the business requirements. Definitely need to discuss the custom objects and the price markup with the client.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
1 year ago
I think the Architect should also discuss option C, as there is no requirement to factor material cost into the final price.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
1 year ago
I agree with Jillian, the unique identifiers for material and color fields are not in the business requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
1 year ago
I think the Architect should discuss option A with the Client.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel