Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Accredited B2B Commerce Developer Professional (AP-202) Exam - Topic 5 Question 85 Discussion

Universal Containers (UC) needs to wrap a Lightning Web Component they have created called "lwcContainerComponent'' inside an Aura component. Which set of tags is the correct approach?A)B)C)
C) Option
A) Option
B) Option
D) Option

Salesforce Accredited B2B Commerce Developer Professional (AP-202) Exam - Topic 5 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Accredited B2B Commerce Developer Professional (AP-202) exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 5
[All Salesforce Accredited B2B Commerce Developer Professional (AP-202) Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) needs to wrap a Lightning Web Component they have created called "lwcContainerComponent'' inside an Aura component. Which set of tags is the correct approach?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To wrap a Lightning Web Component inside an Aura component, you need to use the<c:lwcContainerComponent>tag, wherecis the default namespace for custom components. This tag allows you to reference the Lightning Web Component by its name and use it as a child component of the Aura component. You also need to use thelwc:dom='manual'directive on the Aura component to indicate that you are manually rendering the Lightning Web Component inside the Aura component. This directive prevents the Aura component from interfering with the rendering of the Lightning Web Component. Option C shows the correct syntax for wrapping a Lightning Web Component inside an Aura component. Option A is incorrect because it uses the<lightning:lwcContainerComponent>tag, which is not a valid tag for referencing a Lightning Web Component. Option B is incorrect because it uses thetag, which is also not a valid tag for referencing a Lightning Web Component. Option D is incorrect because it does not use thelwc:dom='manual'directive on the Aura component, which is required for manually rendering a Lightning Web Component inside an Aura component.Reference:Composition | Lightning Web Components Developer Guide,Using Lightning Web Components inside Aura Components,Aura Coexistence | Lightning Web Components Developer Guide


by Gladys at Nov 21, 2025, 12:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Accredited B2B Commerce Developer Professional (AP-202) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Sheridan
5 months ago
True, A is popular in the community.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
5 months ago
A is definitely the most common approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
5 months ago
D has some interesting points, but I doubt it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
6 months ago
C looks good, but I'm not sure about the syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. It seems more structured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards D, but I'm not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
7 months ago
Definitely not C, that's for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
7 months ago
Option D? Really? That's gotta be a joke, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
7 months ago
Hmm, this one's tricky. I'll have to think it over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
7 months ago
Option A seems a bit off, but I can't quite put my finger on why.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
7 months ago
I'm pretty sure Option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
7 months ago
Option B looks good to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
8 months ago
I think it’s definitely one of the options with and , but I’m not positive about the exact structure. I need to double-check my notes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
8 months ago
I feel like the answer might be in the options, but I can't remember if we need to include any specific attributes when wrapping the LWC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
8 months ago
I think I saw a practice question similar to this, and it had to do with using inside an Aura component. But I'm not sure if that's the right way to do it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
8 months ago
I remember we discussed how to wrap LWC in Aura components, but I can't recall the exact syntax. Was it something like using and then including the LWC tag?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
8 months ago
Based on my understanding, Option B is the way to go. The tags shown in that option seem to be the appropriate way to embed an LWC within an Aura component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
8 months ago
I think it's actually Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
9 months ago
Option B looks right to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
9 months ago
Option C looks promising, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the correct way to wrap an LWC inside an Aura component. I'll need to double-check the documentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
9 months ago
Wait, can you really wrap LWC in Aura like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
9 months ago
I think it's option A. Looks straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Percy
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. I'll need to review the differences between Aura and Lightning Web Components to determine the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
10 months ago
I think the correct approach is Option B, since the question specifically mentions wrapping the Lightning Web Component inside an Aura component.
upvoted 0 times
Hildegarde
4 months ago
Definitely B! It fits the requirement perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
4 months ago
Option C looks interesting, but I agree with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards Option A, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
5 months ago
Yeah, wrapping it in Aura makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
5 months ago
I believe Option B is the right choice too!
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel