Salesforce ARC-101 Exam - Topic 6 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ARC-101 exam

Question #: 37
Topic #: 6

Universal Containers has a requirement for all accounts that do NOT qualify for a business extension (Custom field on the account record) for the next month to send a meeting invite to their contacts from the marketing automation system to discuss the next steps. It is estimated there will be approximately 1MilIion contacts per month.

What is the recommended solution?

AUse Batch Apex.

BUse Time-based workflow rule.

CUse Process builder.

DUse Trigger.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C

by Lashawna at May 19, 2024, 07:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ARC-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lashaunda

3 months ago

Wait, 1 million invites? That sounds like a lot of emails!

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxanne

3 months ago

Time-based workflow could work too, but not as scalable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maricela

3 months ago

Not sure about Batch Apex, what if it hits governor limits?

upvoted 0 times

...

Maxima

4 months ago

Totally agree, Batch Apex can process large volumes efficiently!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rana

4 months ago

I think Batch Apex is the way to go for handling that many contacts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erinn

4 months ago

I feel like using a Trigger might be too complex for this requirement, but I need to double-check the best practices we covered.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmen

4 months ago

Process Builder seems like it could handle this, but I worry about the limits with a million contacts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Talia

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think Time-based workflow rules could work too, especially since we need to schedule invites.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mirta

5 months ago

I remember we discussed Batch Apex for handling large data volumes, so that might be a good option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Filiberto

5 months ago

Trigger might be overkill for this use case, but I'll keep it in mind as a potential solution if the other options don't seem quite right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristofer

5 months ago

Batch Apex seems like the way to go here, given the large volume of contacts. I'll make sure to plan for efficient processing and error handling.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marti

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each option carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isidra

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused on the difference between a time-based workflow rule and Process Builder. I'll need to review the documentation to decide which one is better suited for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards option D. The question says the vendor has assured full backward compatibility, so I don't see a need to run any tests. I'd just confirm with the infrastructure team that the update is complete and call it a day.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trevor

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the specific reasons for automatic NGFW installation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

5 months ago

I feel like we've seen questions about the advantages of 4G before, and I think it had to do with better speeds like broadband-cable. That makes sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelina

5 months ago

I remember reading somewhere that Arista switches have a default of no password at all, just the username "Arista". That seems like the most logical choice here. I'll go with option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Flo

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards 200 locations because I recall it being a higher number in some cases, but that feels too high for this specific setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

9 months ago

C) Process Builder is the way to go. It's like having a personal assistant who does all the work for you, while you sit back and enjoy a cup of coffee.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

10 months ago

A) Batch Apex, no doubt. I bet the person who came up with the other options is still using a rotary phone.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merri

10 months ago

D) A trigger? What is this, the stone age? That's way too much manual coding. I'm going with C) Process Builder. It's the modern, drag-and-drop solution for this kind of requirement.

upvoted 0 times

Hui

8 months ago

C) Use Process builder.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lang

8 months ago

B) Use Time-based workflow rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

9 months ago

A) Use Batch Apex.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

10 months ago

B) Time-based workflow rule? Really? That's so 2010. Process Builder is where it's at these days. More powerful and flexible than a workflow rule.

upvoted 0 times

Lashawn

8 months ago

B) Time-based workflow rule? Really? That's so 2010. Process Builder is where it's at these days. More powerful and flexible than a workflow rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

9 months ago

C) Use Process builder.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

9 months ago

A) Use Batch Apex.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dalene

11 months ago

I'm not sure, I think Process Builder could also be a good option for this requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francine

11 months ago

A) Batch Apex is the way to go. Handling 1 million contacts in a single transaction is no easy feat, and Batch Apex is designed to tackle these kinds of large-scale operations.

upvoted 0 times

Diane

10 months ago

B) I agree, Batch Apex is definitely the recommended solution for handling such a large number of contacts efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martha

10 months ago

A) Batch Apex is the way to go. Handling 1 million contacts in a single transaction is no easy feat, and Batch Apex is designed to tackle these kinds of large-scale operations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalind

11 months ago

I agree with Malcom, Batch Apex would be the most efficient solution for handling such a large number of contacts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

11 months ago

I think we should use Batch Apex for this task.

upvoted 0 times

...