New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce ARC-101 Exam - Topic 2 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ARC-101 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 2
[All ARC-101 Questions]

Which two system constraint questions should be considered when designing an integration

to send orders from Salesforce to a fulfillment system?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Levi at Aug 02, 2024, 08:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ARC-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Laurel
3 months ago
I agree with A and D! Latency and avoiding duplicates are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
3 months ago
A is a must, but B seems more relevant for integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
3 months ago
Wait, can the fulfillment system even do idempotent design?
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
4 months ago
I think D is super important too! Can't have duplicate orders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
4 months ago
Definitely A and B! Latency and address validation are key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
4 months ago
Option D seems really relevant since avoiding duplicate orders is a big deal in integrations. I feel like that should be one of our top considerations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about option C. I don't recall if contract-first interfaces are a common constraint in these scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think option B about validating shipping addresses is crucial too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
5 months ago
I think option A about latency is definitely important, but I'm not sure if it's the only one we should focus on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the technical terms in this question. Contract-first Outbound Messaging and idempotent design? I'll need to review those concepts before the exam. But I think I can at least identify the latency and address validation as key system constraints to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The latency and address validation are definitely important. And the idempotent design is about ensuring no duplicate orders, which is crucial. I'm pretty confident I can tackle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
5 months ago
This question is asking about system constraints to consider when designing an integration between Salesforce and a fulfillment system. I think the key things to focus on are the latency requirements and the validation of shipping addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the other options. Can the fulfillment system really implement a contract-first Outbound Messaging interface? And what does idempotent design mean in this context? I'll need to think through those a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
5 months ago
B seems like the most logical choice here. Chat is designed to capture lead information directly from customer interactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I feel like the ISAKMP policy should be configured correctly for the spoke to connect. Maybe option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
10 months ago
I wonder if the fulfillment system can also handle rush orders. That would be a fun twist to the question!
upvoted 0 times
Starr
9 months ago
I'm not sure about rush orders, but it's important to consider latency and idempotent design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
9 months ago
D) Can the fulfillment system participate in idempotent design to avoid duplicate orders?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
10 months ago
A) What latency is acceptable for orders to reach the fulfillment system?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Launa
10 months ago
B is not really relevant here. The question is about system constraints, not address validation.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
10 months ago
D) Can the fulfillment system participate in idempotent design to avoid duplicate orders?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
10 months ago
A) What latency is acceptable for orders to reach the fulfillment system?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeanice
10 months ago
I believe B and C are also important. Validating shipping addresses and having a contract-first interface can ensure data accuracy and consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
10 months ago
C is also a valid question. Implementing a contract-first interface can help with better integration and data exchange.
upvoted 0 times
Adelina
10 months ago
C) Can the fulfillment system implement a contract-first Outbound Messaging interface?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
10 months ago
A) What latency is acceptable for orders to reach the fulfillment system?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thea
11 months ago
I agree with you, Shayne. Latency and avoiding duplicate orders are crucial for a smooth integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
11 months ago
I agree with Vallie. The fulfillment system needs to handle orders promptly and ensure no duplicates are processed, which A and D address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
11 months ago
I think A and D are important constraints to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
11 months ago
A and D are the correct answers. Latency and idempotent design are crucial considerations for an integration to work seamlessly.
upvoted 0 times
Bambi
9 months ago
A and D are the correct answers. Latency and idempotent design are crucial considerations for an integration to work seamlessly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
10 months ago
D) Can the fulfillment system participate in idempotent design to avoid duplicate orders?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
10 months ago
A) What latency is acceptable for orders to reach the fulfillment system?
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel