MENU
Which two system constraint questions should be considered when designing an integration
to send orders from Salesforce to a fulfillment system?
Choose 2 answers
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium ARC-101 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
LA
Laurel
11 months ago
I agree with A and D! Latency and avoiding duplicates are crucial.
PA
Paola
11 months ago
A is a must, but B seems more relevant for integration.
JU
Julio
12 months ago
Wait, can the fulfillment system even do idempotent design?
FL
Florinda
12 months ago
I think D is super important too! Can't have duplicate orders.
MA
Marlon
1 year ago
Definitely A and B! Latency and address validation are key.
FE
Felix
1 year ago
Option D seems really relevant since avoiding duplicate orders is a big deal in integrations. I feel like that should be one of our top considerations.
OR
Orville
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about option C. I don't recall if contract-first interfaces are a common constraint in these scenarios.
FR
Frankie
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think option B about validating shipping addresses is crucial too.
BR
Bronwyn
1 year ago
I think option A about latency is definitely important, but I'm not sure if it's the only one we should focus on.
NA
Nana
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the technical terms in this question. Contract-first Outbound Messaging and idempotent design? I'll need to review those concepts before the exam. But I think I can at least identify the latency and address validation as key system constraints to consider.
JU
Junita
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The latency and address validation are definitely important. And the idempotent design is about ensuring no duplicate orders, which is crucial. I'm pretty confident I can tackle this one.
GR
Gregoria
1 year ago
This question is asking about system constraints to consider when designing an integration between Salesforce and a fulfillment system. I think the key things to focus on are the latency requirements and the validation of shipping addresses.
JU
Jutta
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the other options. Can the fulfillment system really implement a contract-first Outbound Messaging interface? And what does idempotent design mean in this context? I'll need to think through those a bit more.
DI
Dianne
1 year ago
B seems like the most logical choice here. Chat is designed to capture lead information directly from customer interactions.
SH
Sharan
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I feel like the ISAKMP policy should be configured correctly for the spoke to connect. Maybe option C?
DA
Dana
2 years ago
I wonder if the fulfillment system can also handle rush orders. That would be a fun twist to the question!
ST
Starr
1 year ago
I'm not sure about rush orders, but it's important to consider latency and idempotent design.
OD
Odette
1 year ago
D) Can the fulfillment system participate in idempotent design to avoid duplicate orders?
TA
Tammara
1 year ago
A) What latency is acceptable for orders to reach the fulfillment system?
LA
Launa
2 years ago
B is not really relevant here. The question is about system constraints, not address validation.
FR
Freeman
1 year ago
D) Can the fulfillment system participate in idempotent design to avoid duplicate orders?
CH
Chau
2 years ago
A) What latency is acceptable for orders to reach the fulfillment system?
JE
Jeanice
2 years ago
I believe B and C are also important. Validating shipping addresses and having a contract-first interface can ensure data accuracy and consistency.
NA
Nana
2 years ago
C is also a valid question. Implementing a contract-first interface can help with better integration and data exchange.
AD
Adelina
2 years ago
C) Can the fulfillment system implement a contract-first Outbound Messaging interface?
NA
Nakisha
2 years ago
A) What latency is acceptable for orders to reach the fulfillment system?
TH
Thea
2 years ago
I agree with you, Shayne. Latency and avoiding duplicate orders are crucial for a smooth integration.
LU
Luisa
2 years ago
I agree with Vallie. The fulfillment system needs to handle orders promptly and ensure no duplicates are processed, which A and D address.
SH
Shayne
2 years ago
I think A and D are important constraints to consider.
VA
Vallie
2 years ago
A and D are the correct answers. Latency and idempotent design are crucial considerations for an integration to work seamlessly.
BA
Bambi
1 year ago
A and D are the correct answers. Latency and idempotent design are crucial considerations for an integration to work seamlessly.
CH
Chuck
1 year ago
D) Can the fulfillment system participate in idempotent design to avoid duplicate orders?
AR
Ardella
1 year ago
A) What latency is acceptable for orders to reach the fulfillment system?