Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Analytics-Con-202 Exam - Topic 4 Question 4 Discussion

A Tableau Next Consultant has enabled Acceleration for a connected data source, which is configured to refresh data as frequently as every 15 minutes. However, records that have been deleted from the source system are still appearing in Tableau Next 30 minutes later. What is the most likely reason for this behavior?
B) The Cache Refresh Method is set to Incremental, which does not process or reflect deleted records from the source.
A) Caching introduces latency, causing deleted records to take additional time before they are removed from Tableau Next.
C) Acceleration for Data Connections uses caching, which does not propagate deleted records from the source system.

Salesforce Analytics-Con-202 Exam - Topic 4 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Analytics-Con-202 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 4
[All Analytics-Con-202 Questions]

A Tableau Next Consultant has enabled Acceleration for a connected data source, which is configured to refresh data as frequently as every 15 minutes. However, records that have been deleted from the source system are still appearing in Tableau Next 30 minutes later. What is the most likely reason for this behavior?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

When Acceleration for Data Connections is enabled, Tableau Next temporarily caches external-source data in Data 360 to reduce runtime latency and improve query performance. Two refresh approaches are available: Full Refresh and Incremental Refresh. Salesforce explicitly states that an incremental refresh processes records that have been added or changed since the previous refresh but does not update deleted data. Therefore, records removed from the source can remain present in the accelerated cache even after several incremental refresh cycles.

This explains why the 15-minute frequency does not solve the issue. Frequency controls how often incremental processing occurs; it does not change what the incremental algorithm processes. Option A incorrectly attributes the behavior to ordinary cache latency. Option C is also too broad because acceleration itself supports deletion synchronization when a Full Refresh is used. A full refresh removes the existing cached dataset and replaces it with the current source dataset.

Reference/Topics: Data Setup -> Data Connections -> Acceleration -> Full versus Incremental Refresh -> Cache Refresh Method.

===========================================================================


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters

Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!


Save Cancel