Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SailPoint IdentityNow-Engineer Exam - Topic 5 Question 10 Discussion

Posted by Markus on Feb 09, 2025 at 12:16 PM

An IdentityNow engineer needs to find identities with disabled AD accounts by using IdentityNow's search features. Is this the correct search syntax to perform this task?

Solution:

Suggested Answer: B

No, the statement 'This item is complete' is vague and does not represent any actionable configuration when implementing a JDBC connector. An IdentityNow engineer needs to focus on specific technical configurations like setting up schemas, defining SQL queries, mapping attributes, and ensuring the correct service account permissions. Simply stating 'This item is complete' is not a valid step in the implementation process.


SailPoint IdentityNow JDBC Connector Implementation Checklist.

SailPoint IdentityNow Configuration and Implementation Documentation.

Get Premium IdentityNow-Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
SE
Sena 10 months ago
I've used similar syntax before, it should work!
YO
Yoko 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure this works? Seems off.
RE
Renea 11 months ago
Definitely not the right way to search.
LA
Laura 11 months ago
I think it's actually incorrect.
DA
Daisy 11 months ago
This syntax looks right for finding disabled accounts.
MA
Matthew 12 months ago
I believe the answer is "No," but I wish I had reviewed the search syntax more thoroughly before the exam.
MA
Marge 12 months ago
I feel like I might have seen this syntax in a tutorial, but I can't recall if it was for disabled accounts or something else.
AN
Antonio 12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question about searching for active accounts, but this one feels a bit different.
JI
Jimmie 1 year ago
I think the search syntax looks familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if it specifically targets disabled accounts.
HE
Helga 1 year ago
Ah, I see what they're asking for. The search syntax looks good to me, and I think this is the correct way to approach this task.
AJ
Aja 1 year ago
I'm confident this is the right search syntax to find disabled AD accounts in IdentityNow. I've used a similar approach before, and it's been effective.
GA
Gail 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The search syntax looks like it could work, but I want to make sure I'm not missing anything before I submit my answer.
HY
Hyun 1 year ago
Okay, this seems straightforward. I think the search syntax is correct, but I'll verify it in the IdentityNow interface just to be sure.
VI
Vi 1 year ago
Hmm, let me think about this. The search syntax looks like it might work, but I want to double-check the documentation to make sure I'm using the right approach.
LU
Luisa 1 year ago
IdentityNow, huh? I bet the engineers there have some real identity crises of their own to deal with. Good luck, folks!
GE
Geoffrey 1 year ago
This is easy peasy, I got this! *cracks knuckles* Time to show off my IdentityNow search ninja skills.
CA
Carma 1 year ago
↳ replying to Geoffrey
B) No
GE
Gearldine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Geoffrey
I think the correct search syntax is 'identity.status=disabled'
VA
Vallie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Geoffrey
A) Yes
JO
Joseph 1 year ago
Hold up, is this a trick question? I better not be falling for any shenanigans here. Let me think this through carefully.
HU
Huey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joseph
User 3: I'm not sure, but I'll go with A) Yes as well.
MI
Mitsue 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joseph
User 2: I agree, it seems like the right syntax to find disabled AD accounts.
DA
Dawne 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joseph
User 1: I think the correct answer is A) Yes.
LA
Lamonica 1 year ago
Hmm, not sure about that. Let me double-check the documentation just to be certain. Gotta make sure we get this right, you know?
KA
Kara 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lamonica
User 4: I agree, better safe than sorry.
JO
Johnetta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lamonica
User 3: Yeah, let's make sure we get this right.
AL
Albina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lamonica
User 2: I'm not sure, maybe we should double-check the documentation.
DE
Dewitt 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lamonica
User 1: I think it's A) Yes.
AG
Agustin 2 years ago
Ah, the search syntax looks good to me. This will definitely help the IdentityNow engineer find those disabled AD accounts in no time. Nice and straightforward!
BE
Bettina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Agustin
User 4: Yes, the search syntax seems clear and effective.
EL
Eleonora 1 year ago
↳ replying to Agustin
User 3: Yes, that should work well for finding disabled AD accounts.
AL
Alesia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Agustin
User 2: Yes, I agree. It looks like the correct search syntax.
VA
Van 1 year ago
↳ replying to Agustin
User 1: Yes
JA
Jade 2 years ago
A) Yes, I agree with Zoila. The syntax provided in the solution should work fine for finding disabled AD accounts.
DA
Davida 2 years ago
B) No, I think there might be a better way to search for disabled AD accounts in IdentityNow.
ZO
Zoila 2 years ago
A) Yes, that seems like the correct syntax to find disabled AD accounts.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel