SailPoint IdentityIQ Engineer Exam - Topic 3 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for SailPoint's IdentityIQ Engineer exam

Question #: 30
Topic #: 3

A client needs a custom quicklink, which only managers can launch, in order to launch a simple workflow. Is this a valid step to take during the development of this custom quicklink?

Solution: Place a quicklink object on the workflow that is to be launched

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

Placing a QuickLink object directly on a workflow is not a valid step in the development of a custom QuickLink. QuickLinks are used to provide users with easy access to specific tasks or workflows through the IdentityIQ interface, but the QuickLink itself is not embedded within the workflow. Instead, the QuickLink is created as a separate object and associated with the desired workflow or task that it is meant to launch.

The correct approach would involve creating a QuickLink that points to the workflow and then controlling access to the QuickLink by restricting it to a specific QuickLink population (e.g., 'Managers'). Therefore, the correct answer is B. No.

by Lindsey at Nov 22, 2025, 12:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium IdentityIQ Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Laurena

1 month ago

I think it’s a good idea, keeps it organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

2 months ago

Yes, it streamlines the process for managers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Walker

2 months ago

No, it could limit workflow accessibility too much.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blair

2 months ago

I agree, placing a quicklink is a valid step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mona

2 months ago

Yes, that makes sense. Only managers should have access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Judy

2 months ago

Not sure if that’s the best approach, could cause issues later.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rikki

2 months ago

I’m surprised this is even a question, isn’t it obvious?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dell

3 months ago

Wait, can only managers use it? That seems limiting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyla

3 months ago

Definitely a valid step, makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tequila

3 months ago

Sounds like a solid plan to me!

upvoted 0 times

...

Latia

4 months ago

No, this is not a valid step. You need to use a different approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yvette

4 months ago

Quicklinks are the secret sauce of workflow automation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

4 months ago

Managers only? Sounds like a power trip to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audry

4 months ago

Placing a quicklink object on the workflow is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Gracia

4 months ago

Yes, this is a valid step to take.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sage

4 months ago

I thought quicklinks were meant for broader access, so I'm hesitant about this being a good idea for just managers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

5 months ago

I feel like we discussed this in class, and it seems like a valid step, but I can't recall if there were any exceptions mentioned.

upvoted 0 times

...

Golda

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure. The question doesn't provide a lot of details about the specific requirements. I'd want to clarify a few things with the client before deciding on the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nana

5 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The solution provided seems like a valid step to take, as long as the quicklink is properly configured to only allow manager access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yoko

5 months ago

I remember a similar question where we had to consider user permissions. If only managers can launch it, does that affect how we set up the quicklink?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodolfo

5 months ago

I think placing a quicklink object on the workflow makes sense, but I'm not entirely sure if it should be restricted to managers only.

upvoted 0 times

...

Walker

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. If the requirement is that only managers can launch the quicklink, then the solution of just placing a quicklink object on the workflow may not be enough. We'd need to add some kind of access control or permission check.

upvoted 0 times

...