MENU
A wireless administrator wishes to consolidate the management of RUCKUS APs by onboarding three new sites to SmartZone 5.2. The APs currently managed by this SmartZone cluster are running AP firmware 5.2.1.0.1038. The administrator has noted the following AP software versions for each of the sites:
The APs in San Mateo are running 200.7.10.202.121
The APs in Toronto are running 102.0.0.0.5
The APs in Mexico City are running 5.2.0.0.1412
Which three statements are true with regard to onboarding, one for each of these three sites? (Choose three.)
In this SmartZone 5.2 onboarding scenario:
San Mateo (200.7.10.202.121): These APs are running Unleashed firmware, which cannot directly join a SmartZone controller. According to the RUCKUS One Online Help -- AP Firmware Migration, Unleashed APs must first be converted to Standalone (Solo) mode using CLI (set director ip <SZ_IP> or set scg ip) before they can connect. Thus, D (San Mateo devices can use ap-mode commands to onboard) is correct.
Toronto (102.0.0.0.5): This firmware version represents ZoneDirector (ZD) code. APs on ZD firmware communicate using LWAPP, and to migrate them, administrators must perform a firmware conversion process (using set scg ip) for SmartZone compatibility. Therefore, E (Toronto devices will use LWAPP to communicate to SmartZone) is correct.
Mexico City (5.2.0.0.1412): These APs already match the SmartZone firmware family (5.2.x), meaning they are currently or can immediately be managed by this SmartZone cluster. Therefore, F is correct.
RUCKUS One Online Help -- AP Firmware Compatibility and Onboarding
RUCKUS Analytics 3.5 User Guide -- Device Connection and Cluster Management
RUCKUS AI Documentation -- SmartZone AP Management and Migration Workflows